2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a narrated stop-motion animation to explain science: The affordances of “Slowmation” for generating discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
27
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experiences may enhance preservice teachers' confidence in using technology before they enter their science methods courses. Furthermore, creating instructional opportunities for preservice teachers to plan and implement technology‐rich lessons during their field placements would help them witness the use of such devices to promote student learning (Hoban & Nielsen, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiences may enhance preservice teachers' confidence in using technology before they enter their science methods courses. Furthermore, creating instructional opportunities for preservice teachers to plan and implement technology‐rich lessons during their field placements would help them witness the use of such devices to promote student learning (Hoban & Nielsen, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the stop-motion construction process was halted several times enabling preservice teachers to check, discuss and revise information (Hoban & Nielsen, 2014). Thus the construction process enables an ongoing interplay between existing knowledge (interpretant), content from the Internet such as Wikipedia or YouTube clips (referent) and the ideas being documenting in the representations (representamen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slowmation is a visualization technique involving model-making, which is an important part of science learning (Gilbert, 2007;Phillips, Norris, & Macnab, 2010). Whilst there have been studies on the process that preservice teachers use in constructing a slowmation (Hoban & Nielsen, 2010), the type and sequences of representations in construction (Hoban, Loughran, & Nielsen, 2011) and the nature of learning (Hoban & Nielsen, 2012) and social interactions (Hoban & Nielsen, 2014), there has not been a study on the design process of making a slowmation as a digital teaching resource.…”
Section: Designing a Digital Teaching Resource To Explain Phases Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hoban and colleagues did not originally address other stages commonly found in the classroom context where student teachers working in groups will discuss their work with, and show it off, to each other. In a later paper though, Hoban & Nielsen (2014) acknowledge the importance of peer discussion and, using a case study of three primary school teacher trainees, analyse its contributions to pupil understanding. However, in the classroom, the tutor will also organise a plenary showing the class all the animations constructed in the session and orchestrate associated whole class discussion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed Bennett, Lubben, Hogarth, Campbell & Robinson (2004) point out in their review of research on small-group discussions in secondary school science teaching that such discussions are a means of helping pupils explore their ideas and move from understandings that may often be naïve to towards more valid scientific ideas. Using discourse analysis of three of their primary school student teachers' discussion when making a 'slowmation' on the phases of the moon enabled Hoban & Nielsen (2014) to identify four affordances of this process that apparently enabled learning. These were (i) a need to understand the science in order to explain it; (ii) making models; (iii) stopping to check information; and (iv) sharing personal experiences.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%