Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence mapping is an emerging tool used to systematically identify, organize and summarize the quantity and focus of scientific evidence on a broad topic, but there are currently no methodological standards. Using the topic of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) and selected health outcomes, we describe the process of creating an evidence-map database and demonstrate several example descriptive analyses using this database.MethodsThe process of creating an evidence-map database is described in detail. The steps include: developing a comprehensive literature search strategy, establishing study eligibility criteria and a systematic study selection process, extracting data, developing outcome groups with input from expert stakeholders and tabulating data using descriptive analyses. The database was uploaded onto SRDR™ (Systematic Review Data Repository), an open public data repository.ResultsOur final LCS evidence-map database included 225 studies, of which 208 were interventional studies and 17 were cohort studies. An example bubble plot was produced to display the evidence-map data and visualize research gaps according to four parameters: comparison types, population baseline health status, outcome groups, and study sample size. This plot indicated a lack of studies assessing appetite and dietary intake related outcomes using LCS with a sugar intake comparison in people with diabetes.ConclusionEvidence mapping is an important tool for the contextualization of in-depth systematic reviews within broader literature and identifies gaps in the evidence base, which can be used to inform future research. An open evidence-map database has the potential to promote knowledge translation from nutrition science to policy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0105-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Examination and Imaging Findings for Identifying Subacromial Pain

“…For this reason, full passive range of motion is reported as a precondition for the diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear [42, 60]. Our findings support this clinical construct indicating that those with more than 30° restriction of external rotation (performed in neutral) were 7 times less likely to have SAP (sensitivity 99%) and had a higher prevalence of glenohumeral joint arthropathy on x-ray.…”

Credible Phenomenological Research: A Mixed‐Methods Study

“…Once we determined the commonly promoted phenomenological research standards, in Phase 2 we engaged in journal selection and evidence mapping (Wang, Shams‐White, Bright, Parrott, & Chung, ) of the existing professional counseling literature to ascertain what phenomenological standards and practices are being employed in professional counseling. First, we undertook a 15‐year (2001–2015) review of the 10 journals published by the American Counseling Association to determine an initial understanding of the number of articles published per journal where researchers used phenomenological methodology.…”

Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis

“…The veritas plot is a tool to compare several studies or study subgroups with respect to five different dimensions of relevance arranged in a pentagon (such as between-study heterogeneity, publication bias, evidence and quality gradings) [75]. Specialized displays to visualize the qualitative evidence and characteristics of a potentially diverse set of studies are the harvest plot [24], the error matrix display [76], the effect-direction plot [77], and the evidence-map bubble display [78].…”