Crawling-induced floor dust resuspension affects the microbiota of the infant breathing zone

Abstract

BackgroundFloor dust is commonly used for microbial determinations in epidemiological studies to estimate early-life indoor microbial exposures. Resuspension of floor dust and its impact on infant microbial exposure is, however, little explored. The aim of our study was to investigate how floor dust resuspension induced by an infant’s crawling motion and an adult walking affects infant inhalation exposure to microbes.ResultsWe conducted controlled chamber experiments with a simplified mechanical crawling infant robot and an adult volunteer walking over carpeted flooring. We applied bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and quantitative PCR to monitor the infant breathing zone microbial content and compared that to the adult breathing zone and the carpet dust as the source. During crawling, fungal and bacterial levels were, on average, 8- to 21-fold higher in the infant breathing zone compared to measurements from the adult breathing zone. During walking experiments, the increase in microbial levels in the infant breathing zone was far less pronounced. The correlation in rank orders of microbial levels in the carpet dust and the corresponding infant breathing zone sample varied between different microbial groups but was mostly moderate. The relative abundance of bacterial taxa was characteristically distinct in carpet dust and infant and adult breathing zones during the infant crawling experiments. Bacterial diversity in carpet dust and the infant breathing zone did not correlate significantly.ConclusionsThe microbiota in the infant breathing zone differ in absolute quantitative and compositional terms from that of the adult breathing zone and of floor dust. Crawling induces resuspension of floor dust from carpeted flooring, creating a concentrated and localized cloud of microbial content around the infant. Thus, the microbial exposure of infants following dust resuspension is difficult to predict based on common house dust or bulk air measurements. Improved approaches for the assessment of infant microbial exposure, such as sampling at the infant breathing zone level, are needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0405-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indoor bacterial microbiota and development of asthma by 10.5 years of age

“…Recently, we have shown that the microbiota of floor dust are not fully consistent with the microbiota of infant breathing zone air, but the microbiota of bulk air in a room are also not fully representative of the particular infant breathing exposure on activities near the floor. 38 As noted earlier, oral ingestion exposure or exposure through the skin during the first years of life might be relevant as well. 2 One weakness of our study is that the taxonomic resolution of the sequencing approach did not, in general, allow species-level identification.…”

Building upon current knowledge and techniques of indoor microbiology to construct the next era of theory into microorganisms, health, and the built environment

“…Moisture is one of the most potent contributors to microbial survival in air and on surfaces [100][101][102][103], including resistance to electrostatic charges on surfaces [104], microbial activity [86,105], and the structure of the microbial community overall as survivors prosper [34,56,106]. The ability of microbial cells or spores to become aerosolized from surfaces and be resuspended into air due to occupant traffic or disturbance [107,108] is increased by a lowrelative humidity [109]. Low-relative humidity, such as 20-30%, increases the infection rates of aerosolized particles, such as influenza [110,111], as well as overall HAI frequencies [112].…”

Distinct microbiome composition of floor and air dust distort richness estimation in university dormitories

“…Indeed, a few studies reported microbial richness in floor dust is generally higher than richness in air dust. One school study reported fungal richness in floor dust was 1.4 times the fungal richness in air dust [16], and a crawling infant study reported that the bacterial richness (estimated by Chao1 and Shannon diversity) in the floor carpet was approximately one fold higher than the bacterial richness in infant breathing air (25 cm above ground) and two fold higher than adult breathing air (1.5 m above ground) [24]. Current microbiome analysis standard generally set same rarefaction depth for all samples within a study, and in this study the depth was set to 11,000 reads.…”