1987
DOI: 10.1159/000234418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crawfish and Lobster Allergens: Identification and Structural Similarities with Other Crustacea

Abstract: Antigenic and allergenic components in crawfish and lobster extracts were studied using crossed immunoelectrophoretic techniques. Crossed immunoelectrophoresis with rabbit antisera revealed 23 antigens in crawfish and 17 antigens in lobster extracts. Both extracts exhibited structural similarities in antigens mutually and with other Crustacea in crossed-line immunoelectrophoresis. Crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis (CRIE) demonstrated 6 crawfish and 4 lobster allergens when individual or pooled sera from radio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As many shiimp-altergic individuals detnonstrated positive skin tests and RASTs to other Crustacea even in the absence of prior exposure, it was proposed that Crustacea possess common allergens [4,21,[46][47][48][49]. Evidence for common Crustacea allergens was obtained from shrimp RAST inhibition analysis with increasing doses of different Crustacea extracts.…”
Section: Common Crustacea Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As many shiimp-altergic individuals detnonstrated positive skin tests and RASTs to other Crustacea even in the absence of prior exposure, it was proposed that Crustacea possess common allergens [4,21,[46][47][48][49]. Evidence for common Crustacea allergens was obtained from shrimp RAST inhibition analysis with increasing doses of different Crustacea extracts.…”
Section: Common Crustacea Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atopic and non-atopic individuals reported similar symptoms; however, anaphyiaxis was more frequently described by the atopies [13]. Some studies have similarly indicated that atopic individuals are at greater risk for severe food-related allergic reactions [20], Several ofour subjects reported adverse reactions from the 'smell" of Crustacea during preparation [21,22]. The "smcir offish and other food has been reported to induce similar adverse responses [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that time, the identity of the allergen was limited to its reactivity with the patient sera, native and reduction size, the molecular contents, such as carbohydrates and amino acids, and the isoelectric point (Hoffman et al, 1981). Using the same molecular information, cross-reactivity studies between shrimp extracts with other species were commenced with homology ranging from 60-80% among the sequenced peptides (Halmepuro et al, 1987;Lehrer et al, 1985;Lin et al, 1993). The 36-kDa allergen was identified as TM by comparing the molecular characterization of Pen a 1 with the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) (Daul et al, 1994).…”
Section: Characterization Of Seafood Allergen Using Molecular Geneticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAST technique was used as a diagnosis method, where the positive skin test patient sera were evaluated using a crude extract of the potential allergenic seafood, such as in crustaceans, prawn, shrimp, crawfish, and lobster (Daul et al, 1988;Halmepuro et al, 1987;Nagano et al, 1984). This technique was used to study the cross-reactivity between the oyster and crustacean (Lehrer & McCants, 1987) and caddis fly with arthropoda and mollusca (Koshte et al, 1989), which indicated to the non-specificity of RAST to be a diagnostic assay.…”
Section: Detection and Quantification Of Selected Allergens In Seafoodmentioning
confidence: 99%