2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl089607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crater Morphometry on the Mafic Floor Unit at Jezero Crater, Mars: Comparisons to a Known Basaltic Lava Plain at the InSight Landing Site

Abstract: A secondary objective for the Perseverance rover mission to Jezero crater, Mars, is to collect igneous rocks for analysis on Earth. The mafic crater floor unit (MFU) represents the best candidate. Ten‐meter‐scale craters on the MFU exhibit rocky ejecta, rims, and slopes that indicate resistant rock. The frequency distribution of these craters is, however, low. Comparisons of MFU craters to craters on a lava plain at the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigation, Geodesy and Heat Transport mission (InSig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(138 reference statements)
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crater retention and morphometry on the Cf-fr unit(s) indicate that the rock is resistant (Warner, Schuyler, et al, 2020). Warner, Schuyler, et al (2020) compared their observations from Jezero with the resistant basaltic lava plain at the InSight landing site showing important similarities in crater morphology and time scales of erosion between the units, with one notable difference, the thickness of the regolith, and suggested that the Cf-fr unit is possibly igneous rock.…”
Section: Crater Floor Fractured Roughmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Crater retention and morphometry on the Cf-fr unit(s) indicate that the rock is resistant (Warner, Schuyler, et al, 2020). Warner, Schuyler, et al (2020) compared their observations from Jezero with the resistant basaltic lava plain at the InSight landing site showing important similarities in crater morphology and time scales of erosion between the units, with one notable difference, the thickness of the regolith, and suggested that the Cf-fr unit is possibly igneous rock.…”
Section: Crater Floor Fractured Roughmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craters from the underlying unit are argued to be variably draped and show up as "ghost craters" as the Us gets thicker by Kah et al (2020). Warner, Schuyler, et al (2020), on the other hand, describe these as degraded features resulting from regolith development and aeolian infilling. Increased exposure of Cf-f1/2 unit is shown by CRISM signatures displaying stronger olivine signal and weaker pyroxene signals (Horgan et al, 2020; see also Figure 4a).…”
Section: Undifferentiated Smooth Surface Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There could be a mechanism eroding or reworking the VFU more efficiently closer to the fan and causing it to break down, thereby lowering the TI in this area relative to the center of the crater. Warner et al (2020) suggest that the smooth portion of the VFU may have been less stripped of fine sediments by wind deflation compared to the rough portions, or that the material covering VFU1 and VFU2 has been derived from erosion of the adjacent WFD materials. Ruff (2017) suggested the possibility that the WFD unit could be stratigraphically younger than the VFU, and that the deposits may have been partially eroded away over time.…”
Section: Volcanic Floor Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%