1991
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90069-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack path selection in a brittle adhesive layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the phase angle resulted in a crack path which was closer to the more highly strained arm of the DCB joint, and left more shear hackles. This change in the crack path with increasing phase angle was in accordance with expectations [20,28]. The crack path in the aluminum DCB joints was fully cohesive.…”
Section: Experimental Results For Dcb Specimenssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Increasing the phase angle resulted in a crack path which was closer to the more highly strained arm of the DCB joint, and left more shear hackles. This change in the crack path with increasing phase angle was in accordance with expectations [20,28]. The crack path in the aluminum DCB joints was fully cohesive.…”
Section: Experimental Results For Dcb Specimenssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, the mode-II cohesive parameters deduced in earlier work from pure mode-II geometries are appropriate for use in mixed-mode analyses. However, earlier work in pure mode-I tests showed crack growth always occurring in an "cohesive" fashion, probably because of the "T"-stresses within the adhesive (Fleck et al, 1991). This means that the mode-I parameters deduced in these types of tests may not be suitable for mixed-mode analyses.…”
Section: Interfacial Mode-i Cohesive Parameters For Mixed-mode Fracturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although factors such as film thickness, crack tip reaction kinetics and humidity are known to influence fracture energy 5,6 , quantitative partitioning of Γ FT in terms of specific atomistic processes has been elusive. As a result, current atomistic descriptions of interfacial fracture energetics are primarily based on theoretical models and computer simulations 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%