2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPR quality during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
37
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the highest service level of emergency medical technician (EMT) is limited to the level of intermediate EMT in the US, CPR performance may be inadequate compared to Western countries with high service level 36. In addition, feedback CPR devices that can be used to maintain the quality of CPR during transport are not widely used in Korea 37. Therefore, quality control of compression during transport is also limited in Korea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the highest service level of emergency medical technician (EMT) is limited to the level of intermediate EMT in the US, CPR performance may be inadequate compared to Western countries with high service level 36. In addition, feedback CPR devices that can be used to maintain the quality of CPR during transport are not widely used in Korea 37. Therefore, quality control of compression during transport is also limited in Korea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The act of transferring the patient from the scene of the cardiac arrest to the ambulance and then to hospital may lead to reduction in the quality of CPR [23] . Some observational studies have reported reduced chest compression depth and more interruptions during ambulance transport compared to resuscitation at the site of the cardiac arrest [24,25,26] although this is not universally observed [27] . Un-restrained ambulance staff are at risk of musculoskeletal injuries from acceleration forces during emergency ambulance transport [8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…154 (67.8%) patients were male, 114 (56.7%) received bystander CPR, 148 (65.2%) had comorbidities and 62 (27.3%) were living independently; however none of these characteristics were significantly different between groups ( Table 2), however when including ambulance response times, Non-uTOR terminate had longer call to scene departure and call to hospital arrival times (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) than uTOR terminate. Interventions provided before hospital arrival Adrenaline was almost universally administered (n=225, 99.1%) at a median time between emergency call to first drug administration of 21 minutes (IQR [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Only patients in the Non-uTOR terminate group received prehospital defibrillations with a median of two shocks (IQR 1-5) at a median time from call to first defibrillation of 11 minutes (IQR 8-15).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea of a strategy of support enhanced by the "bundle" of concepts is developing in the literature. Thus, Cheskes et al [24] describe a "high-quality CPR" such as the combination of a CCF greater than 70% and reaching the objectives in the recommendations for frequency and depth of CC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%