2016 IEEE Nordic Circuits and Systems Conference (NORCAS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/norchip.2016.7792892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CPCIe: A compression-enabled PCIe core for energy and performance optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Occam's latency penalty for the initial inter-chip transfer has minimal impact on performance (Section III-E). The typical-case PCIe latency of 30µs per partition (PCIe latency varies from 10µs to 50µs [42]) results in slightly reducing the average 2.06x speedup to approximately 2.01x. (Subsequent transfers are hidden under computation due to We discuss next the energy penalty of inter-chip communication.…”
Section: A Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, Occam's latency penalty for the initial inter-chip transfer has minimal impact on performance (Section III-E). The typical-case PCIe latency of 30µs per partition (PCIe latency varies from 10µs to 50µs [42]) results in slightly reducing the average 2.06x speedup to approximately 2.01x. (Subsequent transfers are hidden under computation due to We discuss next the energy penalty of inter-chip communication.…”
Section: A Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occam drastically cuts memory transfers (21x on average, in Table III) but incurs the extra energy of chipto-chip transfers at partition boundaries. The net effect of these factors is 33% average reduction in energy because the energy cost/bit for DRAM and PCIe are similar (6pJ/bit [32], [42]). Finally, Layer Fusion's memory energy saving due to fewer transfers (Table III) are offset by its significant recomputation overhead induced by its sub-optimal tiles, resulting in a net energy saving of 12% on average.…”
Section: A Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%