2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3000770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coyote Optimization Algorithm for Parameters Estimation of Various Models of Solar Cells and PV Modules

Abstract: Recently, building an accurate mathematical model with the help of the experimentally measured data of solar cells and Photovoltaic (PV) modules, as a tool for simulation and performance evaluation of the PV systems, has attracted the attention of many researchers. In this work, Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) has been applied for extracting the unknown parameters involved in various models for the solar cell and PV modules, namely single diode model, double diode model, and three diode model. The choice o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PV generation is mainly influenced by solar irradiance and ambient temperature [42]. According to [43], the modelling of PV generation is given as: (9) (10) (11)…”
Section: B Solar Pv Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PV generation is mainly influenced by solar irradiance and ambient temperature [42]. According to [43], the modelling of PV generation is given as: (9) (10) (11)…”
Section: B Solar Pv Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A triple-phase teaching-learning-based optimization (TPTLBO) [24], Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) [25], an interval branch and bound algorithm [26] Tree Growth Algorithm (TGA) [27], are applied to extract the parameters of different PV models of the three models. shuffled complex evolution (SCE) [28] technique was developed for only extracting the intrinsic parameters of the PVTDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures are influenced by natural events, such as swarming activities, mechanisms focused on nature, and physics. Genetic algorithm (GA) [18], [19], particle swarm optimization [20]- [22], enhanced leader particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) [23], niche particle swarm optimization in parallel computing algorithm [24], several versions of differential evolution (DE) [25]- [28], penalty-based DE algorithm [29], sunflower optimizer [30], grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [31], whale optimizer algorithm (WOA) [32], harris-hawk optimizer (HHO) [33], improved salp swarm algorithm (ISSA) [34], several version of JAYA algorithm [35], multiple learning backtracking search algorithm [36], coyote optimization algorithm [37], teaching-learning-based optimization and its various versions [38]- [44], political optimizer (PO) [4], evolutionary shuffled frog leaping algorithm [45], slime-mould optimizer (SMO) [46], [47], marine predator algorithm (MPA) [48], equilibrium optimizer (EO) [49], ions motion optimization (IMO) [50], improved PSO (IPSO) [51], Forensic-based investigation algorithm [52], and improved learning-search algorithm [53] are among good heuristic-based structures. Some studies have endeavored to hybridize a few of these strategies to boost their performance, such as hybrid grey wolf optimizer with cuckoo search algorithm [54], hybrid firefly with pattern search algorithms [55], hybrid grey wolf optimizer with particle swarm algorithm [56], hybrid WO with DE algorithm [26], hybrid GA with simulated annealing algorithm [18], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%