Abstract:When discussing the commercial applications of photovoltaic (PV) systems, one of the most critical problems is to estimate the efficiency of a PV system because current (I)voltage (V) and power (P) voltage (V) characteristics are highly non-linear. It should be noted that most of the manufacturer's datasheets do not have complete information on the electrical equivalent parameters of PV systems that are necessary for simulating an effective PV module. Compared to conventional approaches, computational optimiza… Show more
“…This section of the paper comprehensively deliberates the results obtained by the proposed I-AVO algorithm and other selected algorithms, such as AVO, SMA, MPA, ( 39) [83], Chaotic GBO [64], Chaotic Jaya [108], and OBL-GWO. All the selected algorithms are combined with the NR method to get a fair result for performance comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any SO situation can be widened to more complex cases, such as multi-objective, many-objective, hybrid, robust optimization, large-scale, and fuzzy optimization [51][52][53]. As a substitute to deterministic methods, there are plenty of population-based optimizers, such as Teaching-Learning Based Optimizer (TLBO) [54], Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) [55], Differential Evolution (DE) [56], Sine-Cosine Optimizer (SCO) [57], Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) [58,59], Seagull Optimization (SO) [60], Political Optimizer (PO) [61], Rao Algorithm (RAO) [62], Whale Optimizer (WO) [63], Gradient-Based Optimizer (GBO) [64], Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) [65,66], Moth-Flame Optimizer (MFO) [67], Slime Mold Algorithm (SMA) [68], Marine-Predator Algorithm (MPA) [69,70], Hunger Games Search (HGS) [71,72], Runge-Kutta Optimizer (RKO) [73], which are recognized as nature-inspired and evolutionary methods. A robust evolutionary foundation and a genre free of metaphors are required for the most reliable methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, improving these methods is difficult because it necessitates more exertion in the optimization process, computing, statistics, and noise impacts. The chaotic drifted JAYA algorithm [79], improved JAYA [80], linear population size reduction based on success history adaptive DE (LSHADE) [46], GWO-PSO [81], GWO-Cuckoo search [82], chaotic GBO (CGBO) [64], Opposition-Based Learning EO (OBLEO) algorithm [83], OBLGWO [84], and others are some examples. The PV parameter estimation optimization problem is a hot topic right now.…”
Parameter identification and accurate photovoltaic (PV) modeling from basic I-V information are necessary for simulation, optimization, and control of the PV systems. Therefore, this paper proposes an Improved-African Vultures Optimization (I-AVO) algorithm, which combines the general Opposition-Based Learning (OBL) and Orthogonal Learning to extract the unknown parameters of the solar Photovoltaic (PV) modules accurately and effectually. The proposed I-AVO algorithm is developed from the basic version of the recently proposed African Vultures Optimization (AVO) algorithm. The solar PV parameters estimation problem is considered to be a complex optimization problem with the characteristics such as multidimensional, nonlinear, Transcendental, and multi-modal. Therefore, the basic variant of AVO struggles to produce the optimal and is stuck at local optima when it handles this complex optimization problem. Therefore, the I-AVO is formulated by combining the features of OL and OBL, along with the AVO, to generate the optimal solution. Out of various PV models, Three-Diode Model has been considered to determine the parameters. Furthermore, Newton-Raphson (NR) technique is discussed to solve the chaotic behavior of the I-V curve relation. The obtained results proved that the proposed I-AVO along with NR, called I-AVO-NR, can accurately obtain the optimal solution. The superiority of the proposed algorithm is proved to be better than other advanced algorithms based on the obtained results and their comparison. Based on the statistical test value obtained from Friedman's test, the proposed algorithm stood first among eight algorithms with the ranking value of 1.542 for two case studies.
“…This section of the paper comprehensively deliberates the results obtained by the proposed I-AVO algorithm and other selected algorithms, such as AVO, SMA, MPA, ( 39) [83], Chaotic GBO [64], Chaotic Jaya [108], and OBL-GWO. All the selected algorithms are combined with the NR method to get a fair result for performance comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any SO situation can be widened to more complex cases, such as multi-objective, many-objective, hybrid, robust optimization, large-scale, and fuzzy optimization [51][52][53]. As a substitute to deterministic methods, there are plenty of population-based optimizers, such as Teaching-Learning Based Optimizer (TLBO) [54], Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) [55], Differential Evolution (DE) [56], Sine-Cosine Optimizer (SCO) [57], Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) [58,59], Seagull Optimization (SO) [60], Political Optimizer (PO) [61], Rao Algorithm (RAO) [62], Whale Optimizer (WO) [63], Gradient-Based Optimizer (GBO) [64], Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) [65,66], Moth-Flame Optimizer (MFO) [67], Slime Mold Algorithm (SMA) [68], Marine-Predator Algorithm (MPA) [69,70], Hunger Games Search (HGS) [71,72], Runge-Kutta Optimizer (RKO) [73], which are recognized as nature-inspired and evolutionary methods. A robust evolutionary foundation and a genre free of metaphors are required for the most reliable methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, improving these methods is difficult because it necessitates more exertion in the optimization process, computing, statistics, and noise impacts. The chaotic drifted JAYA algorithm [79], improved JAYA [80], linear population size reduction based on success history adaptive DE (LSHADE) [46], GWO-PSO [81], GWO-Cuckoo search [82], chaotic GBO (CGBO) [64], Opposition-Based Learning EO (OBLEO) algorithm [83], OBLGWO [84], and others are some examples. The PV parameter estimation optimization problem is a hot topic right now.…”
Parameter identification and accurate photovoltaic (PV) modeling from basic I-V information are necessary for simulation, optimization, and control of the PV systems. Therefore, this paper proposes an Improved-African Vultures Optimization (I-AVO) algorithm, which combines the general Opposition-Based Learning (OBL) and Orthogonal Learning to extract the unknown parameters of the solar Photovoltaic (PV) modules accurately and effectually. The proposed I-AVO algorithm is developed from the basic version of the recently proposed African Vultures Optimization (AVO) algorithm. The solar PV parameters estimation problem is considered to be a complex optimization problem with the characteristics such as multidimensional, nonlinear, Transcendental, and multi-modal. Therefore, the basic variant of AVO struggles to produce the optimal and is stuck at local optima when it handles this complex optimization problem. Therefore, the I-AVO is formulated by combining the features of OL and OBL, along with the AVO, to generate the optimal solution. Out of various PV models, Three-Diode Model has been considered to determine the parameters. Furthermore, Newton-Raphson (NR) technique is discussed to solve the chaotic behavior of the I-V curve relation. The obtained results proved that the proposed I-AVO along with NR, called I-AVO-NR, can accurately obtain the optimal solution. The superiority of the proposed algorithm is proved to be better than other advanced algorithms based on the obtained results and their comparison. Based on the statistical test value obtained from Friedman's test, the proposed algorithm stood first among eight algorithms with the ranking value of 1.542 for two case studies.
In this paper, a comprehensive methodology based on coot bird metahurestic optimizer called CBMO is presented aiming to demonstrate the performance of solar units under various operating and loading scenarios. The CBMO is capable to deal with different complicated behavior in both harmonized or disorderly phases and can define its major parameters with proofed indicators. It can convey from exploration state to exploitation state to realize a fast and better convergence without trapping in local minima. At first stage of this effort, the optimal values of uncertain parameters of well-known benchmarking PV units under study are cropped with compulsory validations and comparisons. It can be mentioned here both single-and doublediode models of such units are utilized, and their unknown parameters are emphasized. Then, a Simulink detailed model is built-up employing the obtained parameters with various types of connected loads such as static resistive load and dynamic DC motor to appraise the operating performance of such units. It is worth mentioning that the performance of solar units under varied sun radiations and cell temperatures are made along the presented work. To sum up, it can be empathized that the CBMO performs well, and its results are very competitive to those available in the literature.
“…), and population-based algorithms (Teaching-Learning-based Optimizer (TLBO) and its variants [82,83], Jaya algorithm and its variants [84][85][86], Political Optimizer (PO) [87], Rao algorithm (RAO) [88][89][90], Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) [91], Gradient-Based Optimizer (GBO) [92,93] etc.,). Some hybrid variants, such as PSO-GWO [94], PSO-WOA [95], GSA-PSO [96] etc., and some improved variants of algorithms based on opposition-based learning [15,86], Gaussian Mutation (GM) [97], Cauchy Mutation (CM) [57,98], Chaotic GBO [99], Opposition-based GBO [100], Chaos random number generation [22,49,101], Nelder-Mead Simplex [78,102] etc. are also applied to parameter estimation problem of solar cell and modules.…”
The reliability of the photovoltaic models is strongly reliant on their parameters, which are primarily determined by the optimization algorithm and the objective function. As a result, obtaining the parameters under different environmental conditions is critical for increasing their performance, reliability and significantly lowering cost. Many optimization techniques are reported to address this problem based on the complexity. As a result, an enhanced version of the recently reported Hunger Games Search Optimizer (HGSO) method called Gaussian and Cauchy Mutation‐based HGSO (GCMHGSO) algorithm for defining the requirements of the Three‐Diode equivalent Model (TDeM) by utilizing multiple representations in the algorithm along with an efficient objective function. The Cauchy mutation increases the exploration ability, and Gaussian mutation increases the exploitation ability of the basic HGSO. Furthermore, an Enhanced Newton–Raphson Method (ENRM) is presented to effectively solve the behaviour of the current–voltage relation of the TDeM. The robust optimization is also considered to demonstrate the impact of the measurement error. Comparing the GCMHGSO‐ENRM to other competitors reveals that the proposed GCMHGSO‐ENRM can accurately find the best solution, and its effectiveness is verified in many statistical parameters. It is found that the GCMHGSO‐ENRM algorithm is stable and robust compared to other competitors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.