2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12156-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-CXNet: Detecting COVID-19 in frontal chest X-ray images using deep learning

Abstract: One of the primary clinical observations for screening the novel coronavirus is capturing a chest x-ray image. In most patients, a chest x-ray contains abnormalities, such as consolidation, resulting from COVID-19 viral pneumonia. In this study, research is conducted on efficiently detecting imaging features of this type of pneumonia using deep convolutional neural networks in a large dataset. It is demonstrated that simple models, alongside the majority of pretrained networks in the literature, focus on irrel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the work of a group of researchers from Qatar University and the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and collaborators from Pakistan, Malaysia, and medical doctors [ 77 , 78 ], we collected a dataset containing 3616 COVID-19 positives, 10,192 normal and 1345 viral pneumonia chest X-ray images. The COVID-19 data were collected from the various publicly accessible datasets, online sources, and published papers [ 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ], normal data were collected from two different datasets [ 85 , 86 ], and viral pneumonia data were collected from chest X-ray images (pneumonia) database [ 86 ]. Few samples of chest X-ray images are shown in Figure 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work of a group of researchers from Qatar University and the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and collaborators from Pakistan, Malaysia, and medical doctors [ 77 , 78 ], we collected a dataset containing 3616 COVID-19 positives, 10,192 normal and 1345 viral pneumonia chest X-ray images. The COVID-19 data were collected from the various publicly accessible datasets, online sources, and published papers [ 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ], normal data were collected from two different datasets [ 85 , 86 ], and viral pneumonia data were collected from chest X-ray images (pneumonia) database [ 86 ]. Few samples of chest X-ray images are shown in Figure 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haghanifar et al 25 made a hierarchical deep learning model for detecting Covid‐19. In the first level, images of chest X‐rays are classified into normal and pneumonia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data set used by the authors contains 780 Covid‐19‐positive X‐rays, 4600 X‐rays having CAP, and 5000 normal X‐rays. The approach taken by Haghanifar et al 25 was very similar to that of Rajpurkar et al 6 The key difference was that Haghanifar et al 25 first segmented the lungs from chest X‐ray and then they only used the part surrounding those lungs for classification. This approach, to a significant extent, solved the issue of “learning the wrong features to reach the right answer,” because then, the model was forced to learn only from the lung region rather than learning from the entire X‐ray, which usually contains a lot of regions other than the lungs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid model combining CNN with long short-term memory (LSTM) for the analysis of hybrid data (CT + CXR) has been proposed by Irfan et al 58 which showed an accuracy of 99% in detection of COVID and healthy classes. Al-Waisy et al 59 9 Combination of CNN and LSTM, 52 DarkCovidNet, 51 CoroNet based on Xception, 49 COVID-CXNet, 48 Truncated Inception Net, 11 different DCNNs + SVM, 67 and texture features + DCNNs (VGG19, ResNet50, and InceptionV3) 68 have been developed for the categorization of CXRs into three classes as normal or no findings, COVID, and pneumonia (viral and/ or bacterial). Among them, DarkCovidNet, CoroNet, COVID-CXNet, and Truncated Inception Net showed performance accuracies of 87.02%, 95%, 87.21%, and 99.96%, respectively, for the automated detection of normal, COVID, and pneumonia CXRs.…”
Section: Two-class Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%