Covid‐19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors

Gat, Itai; Kedem, Alon; Dviri, Michal; Umanski, Ana; Levi, Matan; Hourvitz, Ariel; Baum, Micha

doi:10.1111/andr.13209

Cited by 37 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A study by Gat et al on semen of male semen donors revealed a transient decrease in semen concentration and a reduction in the total motile count (TMC) after COVID-19 vaccination [64].…”

Section: Short Term Side Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review

2022

JCEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After millions of people have been vaccinated as often as four times within a year, the effects of these vaccinations are slowly becoming apparent. This review has been written from an Australian perspective with the main focus on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. We will look at the promises/predictions originally made and the actual facts. We will evaluate the safety and efficacy by looking at the literature and the data from government agencies. The literature review will be summed up in a table listing the so far reported side effects of which many are very serious including death, with this data coming from 1011 case reports. Long term side effects will also be covered and the risk benefit ratio will be explored. The review is ending with some very critical question that need further discussion.

show abstract

“…A study by Gat et al on semen of male semen donors revealed a transient decrease in semen concentration and a reduction in the total motile count (TMC) after COVID-19 vaccination [64].…”

Section: Short Term Side Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review

2022

JCEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Covid-19mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Over 145 days after the end of vaccination, the values of these same parameters had also decreased by 15.9% and 19.4%, respectively, compared to prevaccination levels, but without reaching statistical significance. [71] As regards long-term side effects, a parallel could be drawn with vaccines in general. e two main categories of diseases reported in the biomedical literature triggered by vaccinations are autoimmune: systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), etc.…”

Section: Unknown Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19

Deruelle¹

2022

Surgical Neurology International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The COVID-19 period highlights a huge problem that has been developing for decades, the control of science by industry. In the 1950s, the tobacco industry set the example, which the pharmaceutical industry followed. Since then, the latter has been regularly condemned for illegal marketing, misrepresentation of experimental results, dissimulation of information about the dangers of drugs, and considered as criminal. Therefore, this study was conducted to show that knowledge is powerfully manipulated by harmful corporations, whose goals are: 1/financial; 2/to suppress our ability to make choices to acquire global control of public health. Methods: Pharmaceutical industry techniques for manipulating science and COVID-19 reporting were reviewed. Several sources of official documents were used: PubMed; National Institutes of Health resources; pharmaceutical companies; policy documents; national newspapers and news agencies; and books by prominent professionals (scientific and legal). A few studies have not been published in peer-reviewed journals; however, they have been conducted by reputable scientists in their respective fields. Results: Since the beginning of COVID-19, we can list the following methods of information manipulation which have been used: falsified clinical trials and inaccessible data; fake or conflict-of-interest studies; concealment of vaccines’ short-term side effects and total lack of knowledge of the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccination; doubtful composition of vaccines; inadequate testing methods; governments and international organizations under conflicts of interest; bribed physicians; the denigration of renowned scientists; the banning of all alternative effective treatments; unscientific and liberticidal social methods; government use of behavior modification and social engineering techniques to impose confinements, masks, and vaccine acceptance; scientific censorship by the media. Conclusion: By supporting and selecting only the one side of science information while suppressing alternative viewpoints, and with obvious conflicts of interest revealed by this study, governments and the media constantly disinform the public. Consequently, the unscientifically validated vaccination laws, originating from industry-controlled medical science, led to the adoption of social measures for the supposed protection of the public but which became serious threats to the health and freedoms of the population.

show abstract

“…We would like to share our views on the article “Covid‐19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors.” 1 According to Gat et al., a systemic immune response following BNT162b2 immunization is responsible for temporary semen concentration and total motile count (TMC) reduction, and long‐term prognosis remains favorable. 1 Although the COVID‐19 vaccine is effective, it may have detrimental effects as well. Some of the adverse effects of immunization reported in the current study, such as altering the semen concentration and TMC of participants, could have negative consequences.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%