COVID-19 – the ultimate disruptor?

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has influenced undergraduate medical education in various ways already. In affected countries, educators and their teams were faced with a rapidly changing situation that made traditional ways of curriculum delivery impossible and required alternative approaches. Exams have also been affected and a cohort of students has graduated early and now joins the workforce. There is also concern for the next academic year should the pandemic last longer. In this paper we aim to describe wider implications of the pandemic beyond current curriculum delivery, exams and planning. We describe how our own clinical and educational environment has been utterly transformed within weeks and speculate how much these changes will persist after the pandemic. We also describe student concerns and introduce the thought that the pandemic may have positive long term effects as well. Finally, we speculate how COVID-19 may affect student recruitment, multi-professional learning and the current and future undergraduates' view of the profession. Our aim is to share our experience in the UK, reflect on the direction and magnitude of change seen in our own local and regional practice, and provide food for thought for educators and their teams who find themselves in a similar situation.

Efficacy of Lockdowns in Africa

“…Violating lockdown regulations should thus not be viewed as a recalcitrant move but as a desperate move to earn a living. Mwendera (2020) corroborates by saying that South Africa has a relatively lesser percentage of informal workers (18%) (16.53 million) than other African and Asian states. The number is high in Ethiopia and India, where up to 50% of those employed are in the informal sector.…”

Bedside teaching during the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…The impact of the SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19) pandemic on medical education is well described 1 . Here, we describe an aspect that has received little attention so far, namely the ethical implications of continued bedside teaching.…”