2021
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 stressors, wellbeing and health behaviours: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background Following the implementation of pandemic response measures, concerns arose regarding the impact for population health and wellbeing. Methods This study reports findings from a survey (N = 2510) conducted in Warwickshire (UK) during August and September 2020, and for the first time investigates behaviours which may worsen or mitigate the association between COVID-19-related stressors and wellbeing. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with studies providing evidence that social connectedness at work and support from co-workers and supervisors are important for mental health [27,28]. Those in search of work seemed to be especially affected by social isolation and loneliness, which has likewise been demonstrated in other studies [29,30]. In this study, barriers to participating in social life after a long period of social distancing were emphasized by unemployed individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in line with studies providing evidence that social connectedness at work and support from co-workers and supervisors are important for mental health [27,28]. Those in search of work seemed to be especially affected by social isolation and loneliness, which has likewise been demonstrated in other studies [29,30]. In this study, barriers to participating in social life after a long period of social distancing were emphasized by unemployed individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite previous findings indicating that adverse life events would be associated with increased adoption of risky HRBs through eliciting psychological distress (Bell et al, 2021), when the findings are placed in the context surrounding T2, the increases in alcohol consumption and BMI observed may be due to the increased availability as restrictions were eased, allowing people to seek support from friends to alleviate psychological distress. Indeed, social support has been found to help mitigate negative affect during the pandemic (Szkody et al, 2021), and pubs and restaurants provided a place to see loved ones with the restrictions still in place.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The WEMWBS, instead, did not show a significant variation due to the pandemic, while positive emotional activation linearly increased, although with a quite flat slope, until the beginning of the second wave of the pandemic (PANAS Positive: 30.17 in the first wave, 32.05 in the second). Generally speaking, of the five well-being measures examined, three were strongly impacted in a negative sense [38,39]. The well-being worsening across the two waves in Italy may allow us also to better contextualize other Covid-19 related outcomes and phenomena, like vaccination hesitancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%