COVID-19 During Pregnancy and Puerperium – A Review by the Austrian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG)

Zusammenfassung Einleitung Die COVID-19-Pandemie bedeutet einschneidende Maßnahmen für das nationale Gesundheitssystem. Dies bot den Anlass, die klinischen und ökonomischen Leistungsindikatoren der gynäkologischen und geburtshilflichen Versorgung des Universitätsklinikums Marburg als regionaler universitärer Maximalversorger zu analysieren. Hierzu wurden die Auswirkungen auf die monatlichen stationären und ambulanten Fallzahlvolumina sowie die entsprechenden ICD- und DRG-Kodierungen ausgewertet, um etwaige Versorgungsdefizite aufzudecken. Material und Methoden Die Studie basiert auf einer retrospektiven Datenanalyse therapierter stationären und ambulanten Fälle der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Hierzu wurden über das klinikinterne Leistungscontrolling-Programm QlikView die Daten von 9487 Fällen der Klinik für Gynäkologie und 19597 Fällen der Klinik für Geburtshilfe ausgewertet. Ergebnisse Es bildet sich eine der nationalen Pandemiedynamik folgende Abnahme der gynäkologischen stationären Fallzahlen um –6% ab, während das geburtshilfliche Fallzahlvolumen um +11% im Jahr 2020 steigt. Insgesamt fallen die Effekte für die ambulante Versorgung geringer aus. Zudem lässt sich eine standortbezogene Abnahme der C50 „Bösartige Neubildungen der Brustdrüse“ und C56 „Bösartige Ovarialtumoren“ Diagnosen um –7,4% bzw. –14% feststellen. Eine Rückkehr zu dem Leistungsniveau des Vorjahres konnte im ambulanten in 3 und im stationären Sektor in 5 Monaten erreicht werden. Schlussfolgerung Die negativen Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie treffen vorwiegend die Klinik für Gynäkologie. Durch das Vertrauen in die Sicherheit der universitären Versorgung und das Serviceangebot, werdende Väter nach Schnelltestung am Geburtsprozess teilhaben zu lassen, konnte eine Fallzunahme in der Geburtshilfe erreicht werden. Die Rückkehr zu präpandemischen Leistungsniveaus gestaltet sich weiterhin schleppend, während sich der ohnehin weniger betroffene ambulante Sektor zügiger erholt. Der standortbezogene Rückgang der Diagnosen C50 und C56 ist besorgniserregend und bedarf epidemiologischer Aufarbeitung. Die fallzahlbezogenen Auswirkungen der Pandemie bilden sich gleichsam in den ökonomischen Leistungskennzahlen ab.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Diskussion Der Geburtshilflichen Versorgungunclassified

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Delivery of Gynecology and Obstetrics Services at a Maximum Care University Hospital in Germany

Griewing

Wagner

Lingenfelder

et al. 2022

“…Although advanced age, presence of comorbidities, genetic predisposition, viral load, and particular laboratory features were reported to be associated with more severe disease, our knowledge is still limited about the course of COVID-19 in pregnant women [6]. On the other hand according to the current literature pregnant women with chronic pre-existing comorbidites like cardiac/pulmonary disease or type 1 diabetes mellitus seem to be affected more seriously [7,8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

The Association of Serum Electrolytes with Disease Severity and Obstetric Complications in Pregnant Women with COVID-19: a Prospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Reference Center

Erol

Anuk

Yetiskin

et al. 2022

Introduction To evaluate the association of serum electrolytes with disease severity and obstetric complications in pregnant women with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19. Study population was divided into two groups: 1) Mild COVID-19 group (n = 811) and 2) Moderate/severe COVID-19 group (n = 52). Demographic features, clinical characteristics, obstetric complications, and serum electrolytes were compared between the groups. Afterward, a correlation analysis was performed to investigate the association between serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications. Results Highest serum sodium, hypernatremia, potassium replacement, hypopotassemia, hyperchloremia, initial serum magnesium, hypermagnesemia, and hypocalcemia were significantly higher in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. The lowest serum sodium, lowest serum potassium, and initial serum calcium were significantly higher in the mild COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypernatremia, hypopotassemia, hyperchloremia, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia and COVID-19 severity (r values were 0.27, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18 and 0.12, p values were < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypopotassemia, hypochloremia, hypermagnesemia, and obstetric complications (r values were 0.10, 0.10, and 0.28, p values were 0.004, 0.03, and 0.001, respectively). A statistically significant negative weak correlation was found between hypomagnesemia and obstetric complications (r = − 0.23 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusion Electrolyte disturbances in pregnant women with COVID-19 seem to be associated with disease severity and obstetric complications.

“…In Zeiten einer Pandemie stellt die Betreuung von Schwangeren eine große Herausforderung dar. Während man zu Beginn von keiner transplazentaren Übertragung im Falle einer mütterlichen Infektion ausging [20], zeigen neue Daten Veränderungen in der Plazenta von SARS-CoV-2-positiven Müttern wie z. B. vaskuläre Malperfusionen mit vermehrten synzytialen Knoten und fokale perivilläre Fibrinablagerungen [21,22].…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Corona and Reproduction, or Why the Corona Vaccination Does Not Result in Infertility

Braun

Feil

Reiser

et al. 2022

Background As the COVID-19 pandemic persists and new vaccines are developed, concerns among the general public are growing that both infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccinations against the coronavirus (mRNA vaccines) could lead to infertility or higher miscarriage rates. These fears are voiced particularly often by young adults of reproductive age. This review summarizes the current data on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and corona vaccinations on female and male fertility, based on both animal models and human data. Method A systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) was carried out using the search terms “COVID 19, SARS-CoV-2, fertility, semen, sperm, oocyte, male fertility, female fertility, infertility”. After the search, original articles published between October 2019 and October 2021 were selected and reviewed. Results Despite the use of very high vaccine doses in animal models, no negative impacts on fertility, the course of pregnancy, or fetal development were detected. In humans, no SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in the oocytes/follicular fluid of infected women; similarly, no differences with regard to pregnancy rates or percentages of healthy children were found between persons who had recovered from the disease, vaccinated persons, and controls. Vaccination also had no impact on live-birth rates after assisted reproductive treatment. No viral RNA was detected in the semen of the majority of infected or still infectious men; however, a significant deterioration of semen parameters was found during semen analysis, especially after severe viral disease. None of the studies found that corona vaccines had any impact on male fertility. Discussion Neither the animal models nor the human data presented in recent studies provide any indications that fertility decreases after being vaccinated against coronavirus. However, there is a growing body of evidence that severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has a negative impact on male fertility and there is clear evidence of an increased risk of complications among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The counseling offered to young adults should therefore take their fears and concerns seriously as well as providing a structured discussion of the current data.