COVID-19, business continuity management and standardization: case study of Huawei

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to theoretically and empirically demonstrate the role played by business continuity management (BCM) to address risks such as trade conflicts and natural disasters. This paper also answers whether compliance with international standards such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22301 is adequate. Design/methodology/approach A case study of Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei is conducted to examine how a robust end-to-end BCM system has been established in two decades and in what way it has helped Huawei to efficiently maintain growth under pressure, such as being added to the “Entity List” and the pandemic. Findings Huawei case contributes to BCM theory in its approach to establishing the BCM system and its well-established BCM model. Huawei establishes and continually improves its BCM system by applying the Plan (establish), Do (implement and operate), Check (monitor and review) and Act (maintain and improve) cycle. Characterized as 4Ps: BCM policy, BCM process, incident management plan and business continuity plan, Huawei BCM system is shaped into a loop with end-to-end BCM process, covering all steps along its value chain – from suppliers and partners to Huawei itself and then on to its customers – with key initiatives for all domains such as R&D, procurement, manufacturing, logistics and global technical services. In practice, implementing international standards such as ISO 22301 enables Huawei to develop business continuity but not enough. Optimizing the BCM system is an ongoing effort, and BCM maturity is ever present: continually improving Huawei’s own BCM system and benchmarking against best practices available worldwide. Research limitations/implications Apart from the case study, other methods such as counter-factual analysis can be used to further test whether Huawei’s BCM system is cost-effective. Another direction for future study is whether suggested BCM maturity levels should be supplemented into ISO 22301. In the digital age, how to use digitalization to ensure business continuity is a current issue not just for practitioners such as Huawei but also for researchers worldwide. Practical implications In practice, implementing international standards such as ISO 22301 enables Huawei to develop business continuity but not enough. Optimizing the BCM system is an ongoing effort, and BCM maturity is ever present: continually improving Huawei’s own BCM system and benchmarking against best practices available worldwide. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies to focus on how an organization continually improves the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of its BCM system, with special attention to standards compliance.

Supply chain risk and SME business continuity strategies in the food industry during COVID-19 pandemic

“…As compared to SMEs, larger firms have a pre-established committee, consisting of senior members, who reinforce the whole BCM practice such as risk assessment, embedding efforts and continuity strategies. In contrast with SMEs, they have embedded the BCM as their part of organisational culture and not an ad hoc practice (Margherita and Heikkilä, 2021; Muparadzi and Rodze, 2021; Chen and Xu, 2022). Following the pandemic, they gather the lessons learnt and adjust the plan accordingly.…”

The multifaceted perspectives of future business continuity- aftermath of COVID 19

“…Organizations also need to develop response plans, including communication strategies, incident management protocols, and recovery procedures. 10 Economic conditions can have a significant impact on Business Continuity. Organizations need to adapt their strategies to changing economic circumstances to ensure continuity.…”