1999
DOI: 10.1080/00224549909598388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covert Discrimination Against Gay Men by U.S. College Students

Abstract: This study examined the use of sexual orientation as a meaningful social category and the consequences of using this category. The sample consisted of 260 U.S. college students who viewed a video and completed a 29-item scale (L. L. Thompson & J. Crocker, 1990) and the 7-item Homophobia Scale (R. A. Bouton et al., 1987). Results showed that participants' adjective ratings of targets favored gay men. Participants did not exhibit greater bias toward gay men when provided with justification. However, there was a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results do not bear a resemblance to other research results regarding this issue. There are many research findings which show that women approach homosexuality much more positively than men . The reason that in this study girls were less positive than what we hypothesized is that the majority of the students in our school (96.3%) have been born and lived among the eastern culture of Turkey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These results do not bear a resemblance to other research results regarding this issue. There are many research findings which show that women approach homosexuality much more positively than men . The reason that in this study girls were less positive than what we hypothesized is that the majority of the students in our school (96.3%) have been born and lived among the eastern culture of Turkey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Finally, gender, class, and sexuality must be looked at in context of one another, especially when considering lesbians in the workplace. Although previous research (Aberson et al 1999;Battle and Lemelle 2002;Cotton-Huston and Waite 2000;Finlay and Walther 2003;Glenn and Weaver 1979;Herek and Glunt 1993;Kerns and Fine 1994;Kite and Whitley 1996;Lamar and Kite 1998;Lottes and Kuriloff 1992;Louderback and Whitley 1997;Marsiglio 1993), as well as our study of Whitebread, suggests that gay men are viewed more negatively than lesbians by heterosexuals, the persistent discrimination against women that takes place in hyper-masculine work environments places a double burden on lesbians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In all male environments, the institutionalization of heterosexuality becomes infused with masculinity to create heteromasculine practices (Chan 2001). For instance, research consistently shows that men hold more negative attitudes toward gay men than women do (Aberson et al 1999;Battle and Lemelle 2002;Cotton-Huston and Waite 2000;Glenn and Weaver 1979;Louderback and Whitley 1997;Marsiglio 1993). Furthermore, men are more likely than women to commit verbal assaults and violence toward homosexuals (Berrill 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, learning that someone is gay or lesbian provides a lens for subsequent interaction (Gross, Green, Storck, & Vanyur, 1980) and may increase negative attitudes (Aberson, Swan, & Emerson, 1999;Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). For gay men and lesbians, knowing that another person is gay or lesbian carries obvious implications, such as relationships, community building, and the identification of other in-group members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%