Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2018
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611975031.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covering a tree with rooted subtrees – parameterized and approximation algorithms

Abstract: We consider the multiple traveling salesman problem on a weighted tree. In this problem there are m salesmen located at the root initially. Each of them will visit a subset of vertices and return to the root. The goal is to assign a tour to every salesman such that every vertex is visited and the longest tour among all salesmen is minimized. The problem is equivalent to the subtree cover problem, in which we cover a tree with rooted subtrees such that the weight of the maximum weighted subtree is minimized. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty with this approach is in showing that this type of grouping of small segments into large segments can be done without incurring too much error. As did [4], we also observed that assuming each subtree with length less than OP T to be covered by a single tour increases the makespan by O( OP T ), where OP T is the optimum makespan. The presented argument of Theorem 2.1 [4] (which their PTAS requires) depends on the following argument, though they use different terminology: Let T v denote the subtree rooted at v. The input can be safely modified 1 so that there exists a set of vertices CR such that the subtrees rooted at vertices in CR collectively partition the leaves of the tree and such that CR has the following properties:…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difficulty with this approach is in showing that this type of grouping of small segments into large segments can be done without incurring too much error. As did [4], we also observed that assuming each subtree with length less than OP T to be covered by a single tour increases the makespan by O( OP T ), where OP T is the optimum makespan. The presented argument of Theorem 2.1 [4] (which their PTAS requires) depends on the following argument, though they use different terminology: Let T v denote the subtree rooted at v. The input can be safely modified 1 so that there exists a set of vertices CR such that the subtrees rooted at vertices in CR collectively partition the leaves of the tree and such that CR has the following properties:…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…In this paper, we improve this to a PTAS. Although a recent paper of Chen and Marx [4] also claimed to present a PTAS, in Appendix A we show that their result is incorrect and cannot be salvaged using the authors' proposed techniques. Additionally, we compare their approach to our own and describe how we successfully overcome the challenges where their approach fell short.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generated batch is a cartesian product of all possible choices of the parameters. p_s A list of integers, by default [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. For each number ∈ p_s, we compute the first primes and randomly pick a subset of size k of them as the processing times p 1 ≤ · · · ≤ p k .…”
Section: Batch Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemmecke, Onn, and Romanchuk [17] prove the following. Recently, algorithmic breakthroughs in stringology [23], computational social choice [24], scheduling [6,19,22], etc., were achieved by applying this algorithm and its subsequent non-trivial improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%