1998
DOI: 10.1177/017084069801900504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covered by Equality: The Gender Subtext of Organizations

Abstract: This paper describes the results of an empirical study of the gender subtext in organizations. We examine the divergence of practice and impression of gender distinctions: gender inequality is still persistent in organizational practices while a dominant perception of equality occurs at the same time. Our analysis focuses on the processes (re)producing this divergence. We argue that both the persistency of gender inequality and the perception of equality emerge from a so-called gender subtext: the set of often… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
263
0
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
263
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…They seem to serve as "tokens" by being highly visible in the organization as newcomers in positions of power, and having stereotypes attributed to them by the dominant group, as they are often seen as representatives of their (ethnic) group rather than as individuals (Kanter, 1977). This renders tokens vulnerable (Benschop & Doorewaard, 1998), allowing them no room for mistakes. Moreover, in cases where they represent a group with negative connotations, they have to work hard to reverse this image by presenting a good example.…”
Section: Subtle Discrimination In the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They seem to serve as "tokens" by being highly visible in the organization as newcomers in positions of power, and having stereotypes attributed to them by the dominant group, as they are often seen as representatives of their (ethnic) group rather than as individuals (Kanter, 1977). This renders tokens vulnerable (Benschop & Doorewaard, 1998), allowing them no room for mistakes. Moreover, in cases where they represent a group with negative connotations, they have to work hard to reverse this image by presenting a good example.…”
Section: Subtle Discrimination In the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…nas formaturas, um rito de passagem, elas são sempre condecoradas e convidadas para representar a turma nos discursos. É como se fossem premiadas por serem as exceções (BensCHOP; DOOReWAARD, 1998).…”
Section: Os R E L a C I O N A M E N T O S D A S P O L I C I A I S No unclassified
“…These women have typically broken through that glass ceiling, but the tales of their encounters with the special effects of their otherness show that the problems do not stop after their breakthrough (Benschop & Doorewaard, 1998). Such an alternative conceptualization of space acknowledges that space is logical nor neutral, but filled with politics and ideology.…”
Section: Glass Ceiling As Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And even though FemPowerment is a much more extensive and qualitative oriented instrument, it could not avoid presenting its results in flat figures and using a measure rod to facilitate both the interpretation of results and comparison between organizations. By staying away from the glass ceiling and emphasizing the organizational contribution to the career development of its employees, however, FemPowerment's diagnosis of opportunities and barriers resonates the sophisticated feminist analyses that visualize the social pressures exercised by social structures and institutions, and at the same time, leave enough room for women's agency and their capacity to operate strategically in any situation (Acker, 1992;Benschop & Doorewaard, 1998) …”
Section: Instruments Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%