Cover Crop Mulch and Weed Management Influence Arthropod Communities in Strip-Tilled Cabbage

Abstract

Cover crop mulch and weeds create habitat complexity in agricultural fields that may influence arthropods. Under strip-tillage systems, planting rows are tilled and preestablished cover crops can remain between rows. In field experiments conducted in Michigan in 2010 and 2011, a preestablished oat (Avena sativa L.) cover crop was allowed to grow between rows of strip-tilled cabbage and killed at 0, 9-14, or 21-27 d after transplanting (DAT). The effects of herbicide intensity and oat kill date on arthropods, weeds, and crop yield were examined. Two levels of herbicide intensity (low or high) were used to manipulate habitat vegetational complexity, with low weed management intensity resulting in more weeds, particularly in 2010. Oat kill date manipulated the amount of cover crop mulch on the soil surface. Later oat kill dates were associated with higher natural enemy abundance. Reduced herbicide intensity was associated with (1) lower abundance of several key cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L.) pests, and (2) greater abundance of important natural enemy species. Habitats with both later oat kill dates and reduced herbicide intensity contained (1) fewer herbivores with chewing feeding guilds and more specialized diet breadths, and (2) greater abundance of active hunting natural enemies. Oats reduced cabbage yield when oat kill was delayed past 9-14 DAT. Yields were reduced under low herbicide intensity treatments in 2010 when weed pressure was greatest. We suspect that increased habitat complexity associated with oat mulches and reduced herbicide intensity enhances biological control in cabbage, although caution should be taken to avoid reducing yields or enhancing hyperparasitism.

Global patterns in the biocontrol efficacy of spiders: A meta‐analysis

“…Studies on the effect of crop management on spider diversity should employ functional trait‐based approaches and not rely solely on taxonomic richness. This would help to understand how the functional composition of enemy communities can be manipulated by management practices such as pesticide reduction (Marliac et al, ), mulching, conservation tillage, wildflower strips (Bryant, Brainard, Haramoto, & Szendrei, ), protection nets (Marliac et al, ), landscape composition and configuration, and land‐use intensity [e.g., fertilization (Birkhofer, Smith, Weisser, Wolters, & Gossner, ; Gallé, Happe, Baillod, Tscharntke, & Batáry, )].…”

Evaluating pest-regulating services under conservation agriculture: A case study in snap beans

“…Previous studies have reported improved yields and/or profitability of ST relative to both no tillage (NT) or FWT in many crops (Hoyt et al, 1996;Lonsbary et al, 2004;Luna and Staben, 2002;Luna et al, 2012;Mochizuki et al, 2007;Mochizuki et al, 2008;Wang and Ngouajio, 2008), although reductions in crop yields in ST compared to FWT have been observed in some cases (Bryant et al, 2013;Hoyt, 1999). In snap beans, yield responses to tillage have 22 | B r a i n a r d e t a l .…”

Organic No-Till with Roller Crimpers: Agro-ecosystem Services and Applications in Organic Mediterranean Vegetable Productions

“…Special Issue in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2012). In addition, evidences of the potential of the roller crimper technology to provide vegetable cropping systems resistance to pathogen and pest attacks are emerging (Bryant et al, 2013). Furthermore, the roller crimper technology has been recently investigated as a potential technique to mitigate NO 3 -leaching risk in vegetables production .…”