2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling oxidation of acid volatile sulfide, ferrous iron, and ammonia nitrogen from black-odorous sediment via autotrophic denitrification-anammox by nitrate addition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1996, Straub et al (1996) enriched and isolated three strains of gram-negative bacteria, which can use Fe(II) as an electron donor for NO 3 − reduction. Subsequently, NDAFO IOM were found in river and lake sediments, paddy soils, water treatment reactors and constructed wetlands (CWs) and were mainly categorized as α-Proteobacteria (Kumaraswamy et al, 2006;Sorokina et al, 2012;Jiang et al, 2015;Park et al, 2018), β-Proteobacteria (Anirban and Flynn, 2013;Zhang et al, 2016bZhang et al, , 2019cZhang et al, , 2020aLiu et al, 2019b;Chen et al, 2020a;Ma et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2021), γ-Proteobacteria (Etique et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015Li et al, , 2018aHe et al, 2017) and δ-Proteobacteria (Su et al, 2020), which play important roles in Fe(II) reduction coupled with NO x − oxidation.…”
Section: Microbially Mediated Zvi/fe(ii) Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1996, Straub et al (1996) enriched and isolated three strains of gram-negative bacteria, which can use Fe(II) as an electron donor for NO 3 − reduction. Subsequently, NDAFO IOM were found in river and lake sediments, paddy soils, water treatment reactors and constructed wetlands (CWs) and were mainly categorized as α-Proteobacteria (Kumaraswamy et al, 2006;Sorokina et al, 2012;Jiang et al, 2015;Park et al, 2018), β-Proteobacteria (Anirban and Flynn, 2013;Zhang et al, 2016bZhang et al, , 2019cZhang et al, , 2020aLiu et al, 2019b;Chen et al, 2020a;Ma et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2021), γ-Proteobacteria (Etique et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015Li et al, , 2018aHe et al, 2017) and δ-Proteobacteria (Su et al, 2020), which play important roles in Fe(II) reduction coupled with NO x − oxidation.…”
Section: Microbially Mediated Zvi/fe(ii) Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, blackodorous water phenomenon referred to the water with black or grey colors and malodor smells, which happened when large amounts of discharged pollutants, particularly organic compounds, exceeded carrying capacity of the waterbody (Cao et al, 2020;. The massively received organic pollutants, which dissolved or suspended in the water or precipitated into sediment, were rstly degraded by aerobic microorganisms, consumed excessive dissolved oxygen (DO), and induced a reductive condition (Mai et al, 2021). Subsequently, the residual organics were decomposed by anaerobic microorganisms, such as methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), to form the blackening and odour compounds, such as chromophoric dissolved organic matter, ferrous sul de (FeS), hydrogen sul de (H 2 S), methanethiol, cadaverine, and ammonia (Liang et al, 2018;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, microorganism (probiotics) application has been considered an economical, highly efficient, and eco-friendly treatment for remediating black-odor waterbodies [21]. Microorganisms, such as Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria, Fe(II)oxidizing bacteria, sulfur compound-oxidizing bacteria, and aerobic chemo-heterotrophic bacteria, have been applied directly to alleviate and eradicate the problem of black-odor waterbodies [22,23]. However, what kinds of microorganisms involved in the formation and remediation of black-odor waterbodies are unclear and require further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%