2010
DOI: 10.1021/nn101520k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Epitaxy, Chemical Bonding, and Work Function at the Local Scale in Transition Metal-Supported Graphene

Abstract: Corresponding Author (*):renald.schaub@st-andrews.ac.uk.Resonance tunneling spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations are employed to explore local variations in the electronic surface potential of a single graphene layer grown on Rh(111). A work function modulation of 220 meV is experimentally measured, indicating that the chemical bonding strength varies significantly across the supercell of the Moiré pattern formed when graphene is bonded to Rh(111). In combination with high-resolution images,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
164
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
11
164
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on metal contact and consider the situation where a metallic CNT or graphene is deposited (or epitaxially grown) on metal surfaces. Electronic and morphological properties of these interfaces have been issues of interest and a number of theoretical and experimental investigations have been made for both CNTs [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and graphene 5,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] on metal surfaces. Earlier investigations for graphene on metals are reviewed in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focus on metal contact and consider the situation where a metallic CNT or graphene is deposited (or epitaxially grown) on metal surfaces. Electronic and morphological properties of these interfaces have been issues of interest and a number of theoretical and experimental investigations have been made for both CNTs [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and graphene 5,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] on metal surfaces. Earlier investigations for graphene on metals are reviewed in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,22, and 23 and some of the more recent ones are given in Refs. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Electronic structures of metallic armchair CNTs and graphene are similar in that both have energy bands with linear dispersion crossing at a point in the one-and two-dimensional Brillouin zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b. For monolayer graphene on a Rh(111) surface, the lattice mismatch between graphene (0.246 nm) and Rh(111) (0.269 nm) leads to hexagonal moiré superstructures with the expected periodicity approximately about 2.9 nm resulted from a 12C/11Rh coincidence lattice [39][40][41] ( Supplementary Fig. S1, the characteristic of the moiré superstructures is distinct from that shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The interaction strength varies widely from the strong coupling with Rh [17,18] and Ru [19] to the weak limit (Ir [20], Pt [21]), where G retains its unique electronic properties [22]. The different lattice parameters of G and the metal underneath are accommodated through the formation of commensurate structures known as moiré patterns, where C atoms become inequivalent due to their different bonding configuration with the metal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%