2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling detailed radiation model with process simulation in Aspen Plus: A case study on fluidized bed combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, Matthew et al [47] developed a more flexible version called REFORM, which had removed such restrictions in RADEX. Hu et al [8] further improved the computational efficiency of the REFORM program using parallel computing algorithms [48], employing this in their more recent work [49].…”
Section: Radiation Exchange Area Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Matthew et al [47] developed a more flexible version called REFORM, which had removed such restrictions in RADEX. Hu et al [8] further improved the computational efficiency of the REFORM program using parallel computing algorithms [48], employing this in their more recent work [49].…”
Section: Radiation Exchange Area Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFB technology has been widely used for combustion of solid fuel. It has several advantages, such as fuel flexibility, high combustion intensity, and low emissions [38]. In most gas particle combustion systems, particle radiation is significant and should be carefully modeled [39,40,41,42].…”
Section: Application To a Combustion Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process flowsheet designed (see Figure 3) can be used to calculate mass and energy balances, emissions, and the chemical compositions of products and by-products simultaneously. The previous work of Hu et al [7] had described the implementation of Aspen Plus reactor modules for fluidized bed modelling in detail which will not to be repeated here. It should be noted that the reaction kinetics were necessarily updated to accommodate the gasification processes such as pyrolysis, volatile matter combustion, and bio-char steam gasification in this study [6].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%