2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled precipitation-ultrafiltration for treatment of high fluoride-content wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, great attention has been paid to the treatment of high fluoride water and researchers have conducted various investigations to develop effective ways to remove fluoride from polluted water. The most common treatment methods for fluoride polluted water including chemical precipitation, flocculation precipitation, electro-coagulation, membrane separation, adsorption, and ion exchange [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Among them, adsorption is a relatively convenient and cost-effective way that can remove fluoride from polluted water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, great attention has been paid to the treatment of high fluoride water and researchers have conducted various investigations to develop effective ways to remove fluoride from polluted water. The most common treatment methods for fluoride polluted water including chemical precipitation, flocculation precipitation, electro-coagulation, membrane separation, adsorption, and ion exchange [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Among them, adsorption is a relatively convenient and cost-effective way that can remove fluoride from polluted water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several fluoride removal methods, economic, procedural, and environmental disadvantages restrict their wide usage in many parts of the world. Although reverse osmosis [ 14 , 15 ], ultrafiltration [ 16 ], electrodialysis [ 17 ], and ion exchange [ 18 , 19 , 20 ] have good fluoride removal efficiency and are fairly steady, their operating costs are prohibitively high for developing countries like Ethiopia. The coagulation sedimentation methods [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] are simple to use, low cost and simple to apply; nevertheless, the dosage is too high and cannot be regenerated, causing secondary pollution and difficulty reducing fluoride to permissible levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to remove F − from water, several conventional treatment methods have been developed, including adsorption, precipitation, electrodialysis, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis . However, chemical precipitation with lime and calcium salt can produce very fine CaF 2 precipitate, which is difficult to remove and requires polymeric flocculent to separate the precipitate from water . Induced crystallization, which is based on the crystallization of CaF 2 upon seed materials, rather than mass precipitation in the liquid phase, can be used for the removal of F − from wastewater .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] However, chemical precipitation with lime and calcium salt can produce very fine CaF 2 precipitate, which is difficult to remove and requires polymeric flocculent to separate the precipitate from water. 14,15 Induced crystallization, which is based on the crystallization of CaF 2 upon seed materials, rather than mass precipitation in the liquid phase, can be used for the removal of F − from wastewater. 16 This process has notable advantages, such as regeneration of the material from waste and reduction in sludge volume, compared with the precipitation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%