2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.021741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled mode enhanced giant magnetoplasmonics transverse Kerr effect

Abstract: We show that the enhancement of the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect of a smooth magnetic dielectric film covered by a noble metal grating, is strongly dependent on the precise geometry of this grating. Up till now this magnetoplasmonic enhancement was solely attributed to a nonreciprocal shift of the dispersion of the surface plasmon polariton resonances at the interface with the magnetized substrate. It is demonstrated that by hybridization of surface and cavity resonances in this 1D plasmonic grating,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the T‐MOKE signal is defined as the reflectivity difference between the two opposite saturated magnetization states of the Co layer normalized by the reflectivity in demagnetized state R (0) ΔRR=R(+Mynormals)R(Mynormals)R(0), where R(±Mnormalynormals) are the reflectivity for opposite magnetizations. This definition gives contrast of the change in reflectivity against the unperturbed reflectivity R (0), but introduces an artificial enhancement in the T‐MOKE signal as result of the reflectivity minimum close to plasmon resonance angle . Therefore, we use an alternative definition of the T‐MOKE signal measurement, i.e., the change in reflectivity under magnetization inversion ΔR=R(+Mynormals)R(Mynormals). …”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the T‐MOKE signal is defined as the reflectivity difference between the two opposite saturated magnetization states of the Co layer normalized by the reflectivity in demagnetized state R (0) ΔRR=R(+Mynormals)R(Mynormals)R(0), where R(±Mnormalynormals) are the reflectivity for opposite magnetizations. This definition gives contrast of the change in reflectivity against the unperturbed reflectivity R (0), but introduces an artificial enhancement in the T‐MOKE signal as result of the reflectivity minimum close to plasmon resonance angle . Therefore, we use an alternative definition of the T‐MOKE signal measurement, i.e., the change in reflectivity under magnetization inversion ΔR=R(+Mynormals)R(Mynormals). …”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition gives contrast of the change in reflectivity against the unperturbed reflectivity R (0), but introduces an artificial enhancement in the T‐MOKE signal as result of the reflectivity minimum close to plasmon resonance angle . Therefore, we use an alternative definition of the T‐MOKE signal measurement, i.e., the change in reflectivity under magnetization inversion ΔR=R(+Mynormals)R(Mynormals). …”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion of modes is taken with respect to a variation of the geometry of the grating as was previously theoretically discussed. 18 …”
Section: Mueller Matrix Ellipsometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 We demonstrate experimentally and compare with numerical simulations how the nonreciprocal optical response, i.e. spectral position of SPPs peak, is affected by the interaction with the FP cavity mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The attainment of a large TMOKE response is important for many practical applications that include, but not limited to, 3D imaging [2], magnonics [3, 4], and MO data storage [1].The natural TMOKE response of continuous single magnetic thin-films is weak and its detection is challenging. Consequently, a large and growing body of research investigates different mechanisms of the enhancement of the TMOKE in thin-film multilayers [5], magneto-plasmonic crystals [6][7][8][9][10][11], and nanoantennas [12,13]. All nanostructures mentioned above consist solely of ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic (e.g., gold) metals or contain a nonmagnetic metal nanostructure combined with a magneto-insulating layer.Pure ferromagnetic magneto-plasmonic nanostructures made, e.g., of nickel (Ni) or permalloy (Py=Ni 80 Fe 20 ) [8,9,12,13] are gaining increasing attention due to their potential for integration with microwave magnonics devices (magnons are the quanta of magnetisation precession in ferromagnetic media).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%