SAE Technical Paper Series 2017
DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-0834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled Eulerian Internal Nozzle Flow and Lagrangian Spray Simulations for GDI Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, a different effect on the spray, due to the changes in value of the C ε1 parameter, might be observable. In this regard, literature data [17] show that the best results were achieved for values of C ε1 equal to 1.35 and 1.44, depending on the specific "plume cone angle". It was verified in this work that a value of the constant equal to 1.5 had the effect to increase the penetration of the vapor, especially when coupled with a mesh cell size of 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Standard Ecn Condition: Spray Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, a different effect on the spray, due to the changes in value of the C ε1 parameter, might be observable. In this regard, literature data [17] show that the best results were achieved for values of C ε1 equal to 1.35 and 1.44, depending on the specific "plume cone angle". It was verified in this work that a value of the constant equal to 1.5 had the effect to increase the penetration of the vapor, especially when coupled with a mesh cell size of 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Standard Ecn Condition: Spray Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On this basis, the Engine Combustion Network (ECN) allowed for a specific multi-hole gasoline injector known as Spray G to represent an available benchmark both for experimental and numerical validations. During the years, different CFD simulations were performed on the Spray G geometry, proposing detailed modeling of the internal nozzle flow [14] under both flashing and non-flashing conditions [15,16,17]. Furthermore, LES simulations were deployed for the injection modeling [18] and they were also coupled with DNS investigation of the spray near-nozzle primary break-up [19], while effects of ambient temperature and ambient density on plume interaction and vaporization were experimentally investigated [4,10,20], providing a consistent dataset for the most recent available RANS and LES numerical validations [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HRM has been applied successfully over the last decade to model flash atomisation in gasoline direct injection engines [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The HRM was first proposed by Bilicki et al [13] and later extended by Downar-Zapolski et al [14] to model the influence of non-equilibrium effects on the vapour formation rate during the flash boiling of water.…”
Section: Fig 3 Layout Of Tesla Turbine Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downstream of the nozzle region leads to the development of spray process. The multi component liquid fuel ensues from the nozzle holes as liquid jets and due to the effects of perturbations caused by the nozzle or under the influence of aerodynamic forces, the liquid jets breaks down into ligaments or droplets which undergoes further breakup until a stable size of the drop is reached [23]. The fuel spray formation involves various process such as primary and secondary atomization, collision, coalescence, evaporation etc.…”
Section: Nozzle Flows and Spraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reynolds number of the flow is of the order 50000 showing the nozzle flow is highly turbulent in nature [24]. Besides GDI injectors have a narrow included angle which results in plume to plume interaction and formation of dense spray near the nozzle exit making it is really hard to capture the behaviour with experimental measurement and CFD approaches should be developed to explain the internal nozzle flow with the available data [23].…”
Section: Kh-rt Secondary Breakup Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%