SAE Technical Paper Series 2018
DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-0281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the ECN Spray G under Different Engine-Like Conditions

Abstract: A detailed understanding of Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) techniques applied to spark-ignition (SI) engines is necessary as they allow for many technical advantages such as increased power output, higher fuel efficiency and better cold start performances. Within this context, the extensive validation of multi-dimensional models against experimental data is a fundamental task in order to achieve an accurate reproduction of the physical phenomena characterizing the injected fuel spray. In this work, simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental images showing the liquid phase were obtained using the Mie scattering technique and vapor phase were obtained using schlieren technique. [48][49][50] The Spray-G1 morphology predicted by the simulations shows a good agreement with the experimental spray images. Figure 20 shows the comparison between experimental 18 and computed spray evolution at different time instants after the start of injection for Spray-G2.…”
Section: Spray Simulationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The experimental images showing the liquid phase were obtained using the Mie scattering technique and vapor phase were obtained using schlieren technique. [48][49][50] The Spray-G1 morphology predicted by the simulations shows a good agreement with the experimental spray images. Figure 20 shows the comparison between experimental 18 and computed spray evolution at different time instants after the start of injection for Spray-G2.…”
Section: Spray Simulationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Overall, it is a numerical approach extensively validated during past works in terms of in-cylinder flow, air-fuel mixing and combustion, [21][22][23][24] both for engines and for vessel computational domains. 25,26 The proposed methodology was applied in the context of the Evaporative Gasoline Topic of the ECN6 Workshop and the following conditions were simulated: G1, which is the baseline operating point defined by the ECN for the Spray G injector; G2, which is characterized by flash-boiling fuel evaporation; G3, which is typical of GDI engines early injection events, with very low ambient density; G4 and G7, which are operating points characterized by high ambient density, thus representing late injection events in modern GDI engines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, it is a numerical approach extensively validated during past works in terms of in-cylinder flow, air–fuel mixing and combustion, 2124 both for engines and for vessel computational domains. 25,26…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure consistency of the results, we set this angle equal to 33 • according to the indications provided in previous studies [31]. Another fundamental parameter is the plume cone angle, which significantly affects the spray evolution [31,32]. Evidence from numerical works available in the literature highlight the absence of a consistent setup for the plume cone angle of the "Spray G" injector [31].…”
Section: Standard Ecn "Spray G" Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%