2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-016-3024-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled electromechanical analysis of MEMS-based energy harvesters integrated with nonlinear power extraction circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have found that active synchronized switch harvesting on inductor circuits (Guyomar et al, 2005; Liang and Liao, 2012; Shu et al, 2007) and synchronized electric charge extraction circuits (Badel and Lefeuvre, 2016; Lefeuvre et al, 2005; Wu et al, 2012) enable promising DC power delivery for linear vibration energy harvesters under harmonic excitations. Comparatively, the simple and passive standard diode bridge rectifier provides an effective DC power delivery from linear and nonlinear vibration energy harvesters (Elvin, 2014; Pasharavesh et al, 2017; Shu and Lien, 2006b; Sodano et al, 2005) without unfavorable loss of power resulting from active synchronization. For instance, Shu and Lien (2006b) have shown that the electromechanical coupling coefficient is strongly influential on the mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion efficiency of linear energy harvesters interfaced with diode bridge rectifiers, which emphasizes the importance of comprehensively investigating the roles of practical rectifying circuits in contrast to AC resistive circuit counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have found that active synchronized switch harvesting on inductor circuits (Guyomar et al, 2005; Liang and Liao, 2012; Shu et al, 2007) and synchronized electric charge extraction circuits (Badel and Lefeuvre, 2016; Lefeuvre et al, 2005; Wu et al, 2012) enable promising DC power delivery for linear vibration energy harvesters under harmonic excitations. Comparatively, the simple and passive standard diode bridge rectifier provides an effective DC power delivery from linear and nonlinear vibration energy harvesters (Elvin, 2014; Pasharavesh et al, 2017; Shu and Lien, 2006b; Sodano et al, 2005) without unfavorable loss of power resulting from active synchronization. For instance, Shu and Lien (2006b) have shown that the electromechanical coupling coefficient is strongly influential on the mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion efficiency of linear energy harvesters interfaced with diode bridge rectifiers, which emphasizes the importance of comprehensively investigating the roles of practical rectifying circuits in contrast to AC resistive circuit counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the above solution is valid while N < ε −2 Ω ω . In the summation of Equation (31), harmonics with similar frequencies may occur as ε 2 nω goes beyond Ω and Equation (34), which sums the power of all harmonics assuming they have different frequencies, will not be accurate anymore. Fortunately, since a good convergence will be obtained by values of N far below this limit, Equation (34) is applicable with a very good accuracy.…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear behavior of piezoelectric harvesters may arise from geometrical nonlinearities, the nonlinear response of the piezoelectric ceramics, or coupling with nonlinear energy harvesting circuits. It has been shown that the behavior of a harvester under the effect of any type of these nonlinearities may be modeled using a Duffing-type governing equation [32][33][34]. It should be noted that a Duffing oscillator used as an energy scavenger suffers from a major drawback due to the coexistence of lowand high-energy stable equilibria, making its wideband operation dependent on the trajectory of the excitation [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 While in the above-mentioned researches the harvesting circuit is generally modeled as a single linear impedance in the coupled electromechanical analysis of the system, there are some other investigations which have focused on the accurate modeling of the alternating current (AC)-direct current (DC) converters with generally assuming simpler models for the mechanical part. 1921…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 While in the above-mentioned researches the harvesting circuit is generally modeled as a single linear impedance in the coupled electromechanical analysis of the system, there are some other investigations which have focused on the accurate modeling of the alternating current (AC)-direct current (DC) converters with generally assuming simpler models for the mechanical part. [19][20][21] Surveying the existing literature on fabrication of MEMS piezoelectric generators reveals that according to high natural frequencies of micro-scale resonators most of the fabricated devices compromise large attached tip masses with dimensions comparable with or even larger than the beam length. [22][23][24][25][26] This necessitates taking into account the effect of the tip mass offset together with its rotary inertia in their modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%