1942
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1942.01220010022002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coup-Contrecoup Mechanism of Craniocerebral Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

1955
1955
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that verbal deficits follow right-sided impacts can be interpreted as evidence of contrecoup lesions. Furthermore, the observation of maximal impairment in verbal skills is consistent with the neuropathological findings of Courville (1942) and Gurdjian et al (1943), that the temporal lobes are commonly the site of the greatest damage wherever the point of impact, the lobe opposite being almost invariably the more severely contused of the two.This is not to assume that the macroscopic contusions in relatively 'silent' areas of the temporal lobes are the cause of cognitive deficits. These contusions may do no more than indicate the sites of maximum sheer strains predicted by Holbourn which were considered by Strich (1961) to explain the widespread but asymmetrically distributed white matter destruction she found in the brains of patients dying after severe, uncomplicated closed head injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that verbal deficits follow right-sided impacts can be interpreted as evidence of contrecoup lesions. Furthermore, the observation of maximal impairment in verbal skills is consistent with the neuropathological findings of Courville (1942) and Gurdjian et al (1943), that the temporal lobes are commonly the site of the greatest damage wherever the point of impact, the lobe opposite being almost invariably the more severely contused of the two.This is not to assume that the macroscopic contusions in relatively 'silent' areas of the temporal lobes are the cause of cognitive deficits. These contusions may do no more than indicate the sites of maximum sheer strains predicted by Holbourn which were considered by Strich (1961) to explain the widespread but asymmetrically distributed white matter destruction she found in the brains of patients dying after severe, uncomplicated closed head injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, the results 719 have usually been presented in such a way that it has not been possible to examine the likelihood that one pattern of specific cognitive deficits rather than another may occur after a head injury. This is surprising in view of the observations of Courville (1942), Holbourn (1943), and Lindenberg and Freytag (1960) on the pathology and mechanics of closed head injury and the predictability of sites of cortical contusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Temporal contre-coup lesions are common in severe head injuries (Courville, 1942), and temporal lobe damage bears a special relationship to aphasia and, to some extent, to psychiatric disability (Lishman, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preponderance of right orbitofrontal trauma in our aphasic patients is probably somewhat dependent on the higher incidence of frontal trauma in our popula- tion, in addition to a selective vulnerability of the right orbitofrontal region as compared with the left. Courville (1942) and others have noted that the dorsolateral surface of the temporal lobe was a frequent site of contusion, whereas other regions of the speech area, including the frontal and parietal opercula, were rarely contused. In our series, a parietal lobe contusion was seen in one case at postmortem examination and in another case a contusion of the dorsolateral temporal lobe was seen during the removal of a subdural haematoma.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 91%