2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1000224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

County-scale crop yield prediction by integrating crop simulation with machine learning models

Abstract: Crop yield prediction is of great importance for decision making, yet it remains an ongoing scientific challenge. Interactions among different genetic, environmental, and management factors and uncertainty in input values are making crop yield prediction complex. Building upon a previous work in which we coupled crop modeling with machine learning (ML) models to predict maize yields for three US Corn Belt states, here, we expand the concept to the entire US Corn Belt (12 states). More specifically, we built fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 and the corresponding graphs are presented in Figure 7. 1.0 0.75 −0.06 XGBoost [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.13 RF [34] 1.12 0.68 −0.14 LR [34] 1.12 0.68 0.03 OWE [34] 0 LightGBM [34] 1.0 0.75 −0.06 XGBoost [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.13 RF [34] 1.12 0.68 −0.14 LR [34] 1.12 0.68 0.03 OWE [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.06 LSTM Model with Adam [54] 0.02 0.96 MLP alone 0. The above table demonstrates that the intended MLP with SMO has outperformed with minimal RMSE and higher R2 values among the models that are being considered for statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 and the corresponding graphs are presented in Figure 7. 1.0 0.75 −0.06 XGBoost [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.13 RF [34] 1.12 0.68 −0.14 LR [34] 1.12 0.68 0.03 OWE [34] 0 LightGBM [34] 1.0 0.75 −0.06 XGBoost [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.13 RF [34] 1.12 0.68 −0.14 LR [34] 1.12 0.68 0.03 OWE [34] 0.99 0.75 −0.06 LSTM Model with Adam [54] 0.02 0.96 MLP alone 0. The above table demonstrates that the intended MLP with SMO has outperformed with minimal RMSE and higher R2 values among the models that are being considered for statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies have shown that the accuracy and transparency of crop production forecasts might be improved by combining ML algorithms with crop simulation models. For three US Corn Belt states, RMSE was lowered from 20% to 8% when crop simulation results were included in an ML model, as found by Shahhosseini et al [34]. Table 1 summarizes some of the research conducted in the previous two years to predict agricultural yields.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Yulita et al [22] examined COVID-19 data in West Java and discovered that the Gaussian processes method outperformed the least median squared linear regression method when it was applied to predicting the new COVID patients. LightGBM, Lasso regression, random forest, linear regression, and XGBoost-and their ensemble models were developed by Sajid et al [23] and demonstrated the models' predictive power. The outcomes showed that combining crop modelling with ML improves prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hyperspectral) data in alfalfa (Feng et al 2020), winter wheat (Li et al 2022) and soybean (Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi et al 2021a). Within maize, ensembling has been found to be effective for models predicting yield at a high level -predicting yield of counties rather than plots -using machine learning (Shahhosseini et al 2020), machine learning coupled with crop modeling (Sajid et al 2022), and deep learning (Shahhosseini et al 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%