2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting of grapevine berries in images via semantic segmentation using convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although berry count has been successfully implemented by various authors (Aquino et al, 2018;Diago et al, 2015;Nuske et al, 2014), the logistical requirements for data acquisition at night can be complex. Interestingly, Zabawa et al, (2020) have presented a modern methodology which utilises a grape harvester refitted with sensors for counting grapevine berries, overcoming certain lighting limitations of previous studies (Font et al, 2015;Nuske et al, 2011). However, the modifications applied to the harvester should be considered an expensive alternative which will not always be practical, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: Yield Estimation: Plant-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although berry count has been successfully implemented by various authors (Aquino et al, 2018;Diago et al, 2015;Nuske et al, 2014), the logistical requirements for data acquisition at night can be complex. Interestingly, Zabawa et al, (2020) have presented a modern methodology which utilises a grape harvester refitted with sensors for counting grapevine berries, overcoming certain lighting limitations of previous studies (Font et al, 2015;Nuske et al, 2011). However, the modifications applied to the harvester should be considered an expensive alternative which will not always be practical, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: Yield Estimation: Plant-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berry detection techniques (e.g. Grossetête et al, 2012;Nuske et al, 2014;Zabawa et al, 2020) generally bypass the pixellevel segmentation (bunch detection) and bunch metric approach. In this instance, individual berries are detected and counted for estimating the yield, commonly incorporating a historical berry mass during the estimation process (Nuske et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The harvest estimation maps generated near the harvest time allow the zoning of harvest operations, reserving the most adequate yield levels, e.g., for premium wine production, as suggested by Ballesteros et al [ 25 ]. It does not need the creation of a training dataset for grape cluster detection, unlike most of the previously reported methodologies for fruit detection in field images [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. It overcomes the problem of the on-ground image analysis related to the need of driving the image acquisition platform through the entire vineyard acquiring images from both sides of the vinerows, which in some cases is hard to achieve due to challenging conditions (e.g., slope, wet soil).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike scene recognition (i.e., produce one label for one image patch), deep learning models for semantic segmentation aim to provide dense labels in a patch (Long et al 2015;Chen et al 2017;Ronneberger et al 2015). The advantage of such deep-learning-based semantic segmentation models has attracted the remote sensing community's attention for delineating the boundaries of trees (Zabawa et al 2020), fields (Waldner and Diakogiannis 2020), sparse settlements , roads (Zhang, Liu, et al 2018), and street view objects (Fang and Lafarge 2019). These applications were primarily made with very high-resolution satellite images, UAV images, point clouds, or at least 20m Sentinel-2 images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%