2009
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting complex disordered states by efficient pattern matching: chromatic polynomials and Potts partition functions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally we would like to obtain results for larger N for additional verification. However, while the new method [17] does achieve a significant speedup, the problem of computing the chromatic polynomial remains difficult and so there is a limit to feasible N, P values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ideally we would like to obtain results for larger N for additional verification. However, while the new method [17] does achieve a significant speedup, the problem of computing the chromatic polynomial remains difficult and so there is a limit to feasible N, P values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the chromatic polynomial in terms of sums over polynomials in Kronecker deltas δ σ i σ j seems particularly suited for computations [17] and also directly shows a link to Potts partition functions in statistical physics (see below). Here every σ = (σ 1 , .…”
Section: Chromatic Polynomials Partition Functions and Their Zerosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Timme et al's innovative techniques [29] have allowed scientists to consider the chromatic polynomials of certain large graphs. In this paper, the chromatic polynomial of the 4 × 4 × 4 grid graph with 64 vertices and 144 edges was reported to be computed exactly in 11 hours on a single Linux machine with an Intel Pentium 4, 2.8GHz-32 bit processor.…”
Section: Run-timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, computing P (G, x) for a general graph G is known to be #P -hard [16,22] and deciding whether or not a graph is k-colorable is N P -hard [11]. Polynomial-time algorithms have been found for certain subclasses of graphs, including chordal graphs [21] and graphs of bounded clique-width [12,20], and recent advances have made it feasible to study P (G, x) for graphs of up to thirty vertices [29,30]. Still, the best known algorithm for computing P (G, x) for an arbitrary graph G of order n has complexity O(2 n n O (1) ) [4] and the best current implementation is limited to 2|E(G)| + |V (G)| < 950 and |V (G)| < 65 [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%