2008
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90598.2008a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterpoint: Spectral properties of the surface emg do not provide information about motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber type

Abstract: The surface electromyogram (EMG) comprises the sum of the electrical contributions made by the active motor units to the interference signal detected by electrodes placed on the skin overlying the muscle. Because it provides a global measure of motor unit activity, this signal is a valuable tool for assessing the level of muscle activation.The analysis of the surface EMG in the frequency domain has been used in some instances, such as fatiguing contractions, to provide an indirect measure of the relative chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the efficiency of limb movement was related to the timevarying frequency spectra of the EMG intensities. The frequency components of the EMG intensity spectra can be related to the type of motor units recruited (von Tscharner 2000;Wakeling 2009;Wakeling and Horn 2009;Wakeling and Rozitis 2004), although this has been controversial (Farina 2008;von Tscharner and Nigg 2008). The shifts in EMG frequency may result from the activation-deactivation limitations at the highest cadences, mentioned above (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the efficiency of limb movement was related to the timevarying frequency spectra of the EMG intensities. The frequency components of the EMG intensity spectra can be related to the type of motor units recruited (von Tscharner 2000;Wakeling 2009;Wakeling and Horn 2009;Wakeling and Rozitis 2004), although this has been controversial (Farina 2008;von Tscharner and Nigg 2008). The shifts in EMG frequency may result from the activation-deactivation limitations at the highest cadences, mentioned above (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction of muscle fibre type from the spectral properties of the EMG signal has been controversial (Farina, 2008;von Tscharner and Nigg, 2008) and poses a limitation to the interpretation of the frequency changes. However, progressive developments in EMG decomposition have made it possible to distinguish faster and slower muscle fibres based on the signal frequency with fast and slow muscle fibres producing high and low EMG frequencies, respectively (Gerdle et al, 1988;Solomonow et al, 1990;Elert et al, 1992;Kupa et al, 1995;von Tscharner, 2000;Wakeling and Rozitis, 2004;Wakeling, 2009;Wakeling and Horn, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateva, 1988) because we used implanted intramuscular electrodes with inter-electrode distances of ~3-4mm. The association between the low-and high-frequency myoelectric signal contents and activation of slower and faster motor units has recently been challenged for myoelectric signals recorded using surface electrodes in humans (Farina, 2008a;Farina, 2008b) (but see Wakeling, 2009). However, as discussed above, most of the arguments do not apply to myoelectric signals recorded using intramuscular electrodes in an animal model.…”
Section: Wavelet and Principal Components Analysis Of Intramuscular Mmentioning
confidence: 99%