Digital Media, Political Polarization and Challenges to Democracy 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780429243912-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-surveillance and alternative new media in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is essential to be considered for future studies in social media surveillance field. This article contributes to the growing body of literature on counter-surveillance tactics (Ataman & Çoban, 2018;Hermida & Hernández-Santaolalla, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is essential to be considered for future studies in social media surveillance field. This article contributes to the growing body of literature on counter-surveillance tactics (Ataman & Çoban, 2018;Hermida & Hernández-Santaolalla, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his analysis of Zimbabwean journalists' anti-surveillance attitudes, Allen Munoriyarwa (2021) has argued that encryption tools may be expensive and thus out of reach by newsrooms with limited resources. In Turkey, anti-surveillance practices of activist citizen journalists have been analyzed, pointing at these actors' amateurish-and thus limited-knowledge of the field (Ataman & Çoban, 2018). Two articles have focused on the situation in Slovakia.…”
Section: The Use Of Infosec Tools and Practices In Journalistic Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature argues that the Turkish media workers after the failed coup attempt suffer from an increasing autocracy in the media landscape leading to a lack of freedom in news-making (Akin, 2017) and to their self-censorship (Davis, 2020); furthermore, the mainstream media outlets of the country function as a means of propaganda for the demands of the ruling AK Party and its president within a frame of a state of surveillance (Topak, 2019) and little space is left to journalists to fight against the authoritarian Turkish government (Ataman & Çoban, 2018). Yesil and Sozeri (2017: 543-544) claim that the Turkish government has implemented an online surveillance system according to their logic of religion and conservatism 6 .…”
Section: Noellementioning
confidence: 99%