Abstract:Counseling self‐efficacy and counseling skills were examined over time in a graduate prepracticum class. Efficacy increased with training, but its relationship to performance of skills was weak.
“…Johnson et al (1989) reported that students experienced a significant increase in counselor self-efficacy after observing counseling sessions with role-playing graduate students. Larson et aI.…”
Section: Service-learning Educational Outcomes and Counselor Preearmentioning
Prepracticum service‐learning is an integral part of the curriculum for counselor education students at a large southwestern university. Service‐learning is accomplished by placing novice students in school or community agency settings to acquire early, practical, field‐based experience. Activities are more structured and supervised than in an internship or practicum. Analysis indicated that prepracticum service‐learning had a positive significant relationship with counselor self‐efficacy and a significant negative relationship with student anxiety. However, substantial counseling course work and experience with counseling‐related work both had a stronger influence than did prepracticum service‐learning, indicating that the latter is more appropriate for novice students.
“…Johnson et al (1989) reported that students experienced a significant increase in counselor self-efficacy after observing counseling sessions with role-playing graduate students. Larson et aI.…”
Section: Service-learning Educational Outcomes and Counselor Preearmentioning
Prepracticum service‐learning is an integral part of the curriculum for counselor education students at a large southwestern university. Service‐learning is accomplished by placing novice students in school or community agency settings to acquire early, practical, field‐based experience. Activities are more structured and supervised than in an internship or practicum. Analysis indicated that prepracticum service‐learning had a positive significant relationship with counselor self‐efficacy and a significant negative relationship with student anxiety. However, substantial counseling course work and experience with counseling‐related work both had a stronger influence than did prepracticum service‐learning, indicating that the latter is more appropriate for novice students.
“…Some of these instruments focus on basic or advanced individual counseling skills (e.g., Johnson, Baker, Kopala, Kiselica, & Thompson, 1989;Larson, Suzuki, Gillespie, Potenza, Bechtel, & Toulouse, 1992), whereas others focus on certain content specialties, such as group counseling, career counseling, school counseling, or psychiatry (e.g., Margolies, Wachtel, & Schmelkin, 1986;O'Brien, Heppner, Flores, & Bikos, 1997;Sutton & Fall, 1995). Although a few items from some of these instruments were designed to assess self-efficacy in the multicultural context, they tend to focus only on parts of the counseling process and assess this construct at intermediate or general levels that may not be helpful in predicting specific outcomes.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing CSE literature focuses on the relationship between CSE and other important counselor training variables, such as counselor anxiety, counselor performance, and the supervision environment (Johnson et al, 1989;Ridgway & Sharpley, 1990;Sipps, Sugden, & Faiver, 1988). Ten CSE measures were identified by Larson and Daniels (1998).…”
Section: General Cse Measures: Why They Are Not Sufficient For Multicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten CSE measures were identified by Larson and Daniels (1998). Four measures focusing exclusively on individual counseling include: (a) the Interpersonal Skills Efficacy Scale (ISES; Munson, Zoerink, & Stadulis, 1986); (b) the Counselor Behavior EvaluationSelf-efficacy (CBE-SE; ; (c) the Counselor Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES; Johnson et al, 1989); and (d) the Counseling Self-Estimate Inventory (COSE; Larson et al, 1992). Two instruments, the Counselor Self-Efficacy Scale (COSES; Melchert, Hays, Wiljanen, & Kolocek, 1996) and the Self-Efficacy Inventory (S-EI; Friedlander & Synder, 1983), assess self-efficacy in areas beyond individual counseling, such as group counseling, case management, and family interventions.…”
Section: General Cse Measures: Why They Are Not Sufficient For Multicmentioning
The purpose of the study is to develop and validate the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale -Racial Diversity Form (MCSE-RD). Theoretical underpinnings of the study were derived from social cognitive theory and the literature of multicultural counseling. Specifically, the MCSE-RD is designed to assess the helping professional's perceived abilities in providing individual counseling to racially diverse clients. Data were collected from 181 graduate students in counselingrelated programs. Results of an exploratory factor analysis retained 37 items and indicated that the MCSE-RD consists of three underlying factors. The MCSE-RD subscale and total scores showed adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities. Also, convergent and discriminant validity was initially supported by differential relations of MCSE-RD scores to general counseling self-efficacy, multicultural counseling competency, and social desirability. Finally, the MCSE-RD scores correlated significantly with demographic variables and educational/training backgrounds. In conclusion, psychometric properties of the MCSE-RD were initially
“…In some of these studies, researchers were interested in investigating relationships between self-efficacy and counselors' level of anxiety, performance, and context of supervision (Johnson, Baker, Kopala, Kiselica, & Thompson 1989;Ridgway & Sharpley, 1990;Sipps, Sugden, & Faiver, 1988). Results of studies conducted on school counselors' self- 2009, 10 (1) 38-42 efficacy revealed that perception of self-efficacy has been seen as an important factor on performance and success of counselors (Larson, Clark, Wesely, Koraleski, Daniels, & Smith, 1999;Tang, Addison, LaSure-Bryant, Norman, O'Connell, & Stewart-Sicking, 2004).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.