2009
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/7/075602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb repulsion and correlation strength in LaFeAsO from density functional and dynamical mean-field theories

Abstract: LDA+DMFT (Local Density Approximation combined with Dynamical Mean-Field Theory) computation scheme has been used to calculate spectral properties of LaFeAsO -the parent compound for new high-T c iron oxypnictides. Coulomb repulsion U and Hund's exchange J parameters for iron 3d electrons were calculated using first principles constrained density functional theory scheme in Wannier functions formalism. Resulting values strongly depend on the number of states taken into account in calculations: when full set of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
120
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our constraint on the value of U is consistent with the previous estimates for the 1111 system reported so far ranging between about 2 and 4 eV. [15][16][17][18] Now that we have determined the (U ,J) combination with J=0.2×U for PrFeAsO, we look at the dependences of the calculated spectrum on U and J for variations in U of ±1 eV and J of ±0.2 eV, in order to separately assess the respective roles of U and J. The results are shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our constraint on the value of U is consistent with the previous estimates for the 1111 system reported so far ranging between about 2 and 4 eV. [15][16][17][18] Now that we have determined the (U ,J) combination with J=0.2×U for PrFeAsO, we look at the dependences of the calculated spectrum on U and J for variations in U of ±1 eV and J of ±0.2 eV, in order to separately assess the respective roles of U and J. The results are shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Smaller interaction strength in DMFT reflects the use of a smaller, t 2g -only, effective Hamiltonian, for which the interaction is screened more strongly than for Hamiltonians including all Rh 4d bands and O 2p states. [30] III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is to be emphasized that density functional theory does already contain some correlations and as a result the addition of U can lead to double counting of correlations with detrimental effects in band-like metals. It should also be noted that arguments as to why correlation effects should be weak have been advanced by Nakamura and co-workers, [61] and also by Anisimov and co-workers, [62] based on a Wannier function analysis. In any case, considering the non-observation of the Hubbard bands and the non-observation of the associated strong spectral weight shifts into them as predicted by current DMFT calculations with substantial U we do not discuss these further here.…”
Section: Crystal Structure and Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 97%