2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.93.044333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb excitation ofCa44andAr46

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…zeta potential Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are considered by major pharmaceutical companies as a drug delivery agent of the future for the treatment of cancer and other diseases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Even the cosmetic industry develop today new products based on noble metal nanoparticles like gold, silver or platinum [9][10][11][12]. However, at present are not known in detail the interaction mechanisms between nanoparticles and living cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…zeta potential Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are considered by major pharmaceutical companies as a drug delivery agent of the future for the treatment of cancer and other diseases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Even the cosmetic industry develop today new products based on noble metal nanoparticles like gold, silver or platinum [9][10][11][12]. However, at present are not known in detail the interaction mechanisms between nanoparticles and living cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the N = 28 closure in 46 Ar was predicted from mass measurements, 2 + energies and from B(E2) values, see e.g. [19,20]. Interestingly, the present interaction reproduces well the first two but not the E2 transition strength.…”
Section: Shell Effects In the Nuclear Quasi-continuummentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It was shown in Ref. [20] that none of the available shell-model interactions in the sd − pf model space is able to reproduce the experimental value of B(E2; 2 + → 0 + ) in 46 Ar. One can thus expect that a similar problem concerns the magnetic transition strengths and that the de-excitation strength function may be influenced by the N = 28 shell closure also in the argon chain.…”
Section: Shell Effects In the Nuclear Quasi-continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleus 46 Ar has challenged existing shell model calculations which overpredict the B(E2) excitation strength to the first 2 + state [5,22,23,24], while describing well other observables, most recently related to masses of the Ar isotopes around N = 28, for example [25]. This is not without experimental controversy, where an excited-state lifetime measurement yields higher collectivity in agreement with shell model calculations [26], but disagrees with several Coulomb excitation measurements that consistently yield a lower B(E2) value [5,22,24].…”
Section: Learning From N = 29 -A Complementary Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%