2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182018000057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could diet composition modulate pathological outcomes in schistosomiasis mansoni? A systematic review of in vivo preclinical evidence

Abstract: Schistosomiasis and malnutrition are often overlapped in poor communities, resulting in disproportionately high mortality rates. Currently, fragmented data make it difficult to define the relationship between diet and schistosomiasis. Thus, we systematically review the preclinical evidence on the impact of diet in Schistosoma mansoni infection. From a structured search, we recovered 27 original articles. All studies used mice and most of them investigated hypoproteic (70.37%), hyperlipidic (22.22%) or vitamin-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that the reporting bias was systematically reproduced through the mechanistic research process, without interpretations of possible sources of bias. The main neglected aspects were randomization, precise georeferencing of the origin of propolis, animal allocation, randomization, and chemical composition of propolis 45 , 46 , 47 . Finally, we make it clear that our objective was not to confront the current results, nor to devalue them, but to verify the possible sources of current methodological bias and, from such notes, provide support for data consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates that the reporting bias was systematically reproduced through the mechanistic research process, without interpretations of possible sources of bias. The main neglected aspects were randomization, precise georeferencing of the origin of propolis, animal allocation, randomization, and chemical composition of propolis 45 , 46 , 47 . Finally, we make it clear that our objective was not to confront the current results, nor to devalue them, but to verify the possible sources of current methodological bias and, from such notes, provide support for data consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates that the reporting bias was systematically reproduced through the mechanistic research process, without interpretations of possible sources of bias. The main neglected aspects were randomization, precise georeferencing of the origin of propolis, animal allocation, randomization, and chemical composition of propolis [45][46][47]. Finally, we make it clear that our objective was not to confront the current results, nor to devalue them, but to verify the possible sources of current methodological bias and, from such notes, provide support for data consistency and reproducibility.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Qualitative and quantitative data were extracted from all relevant studies included in the systematic review. To this end, we use standardized spreadsheets (data extraction masks) (Marques et al, 2018) structured from basic methodological requirements to characterize studies at different descriptive levels, such as: (i) publication characteristics: research design, authors, year of publication and country where the study was conducted; (ii) patient characteristics: age, sex, and disease stage; (iii) treatment characteristics: drugs and dosimetry (doses, administration frequency and rout, treatment duration, and patient follow-up); (iv) primary outcomes: parasite load (parasitological cure), seroconversion and mortality rates; (v) secondary outcomes: cardiovascular function (electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data), adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation rates.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%