2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-019-02404-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotilting sheaves on Noetherian schemes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will end this section by introducing an application related to the tilting theory developed in recent years. Namely, Colpi and Fuller developed a theory of tilting objects of projective dimension ≤ 1 for abelian categories in [8], and Čoupek and Št'ovíček developed a theory of cotilting objects of injective dimension ≤ 1 for Grothendieck categories in [9]. A fundamental result needed in these theories is that…”
Section: Is An Isomorphism Of Abelian Groups For Every B ∈ Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will end this section by introducing an application related to the tilting theory developed in recent years. Namely, Colpi and Fuller developed a theory of tilting objects of projective dimension ≤ 1 for abelian categories in [8], and Čoupek and Št'ovíček developed a theory of cotilting objects of injective dimension ≤ 1 for Grothendieck categories in [9]. A fundamental result needed in these theories is that…”
Section: Is An Isomorphism Of Abelian Groups For Every B ∈ Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this theory, the Baer sum can be extended to n-extensions, proving that the class Ext n C (C, A) of n-extensions of A by C is an abelian group. Recently, the generalization of homological techniques such as Gorenstein or tilting objects to abstract contexts [3,8,9,19], such as abelian categories that do not necessarily have enough projectives or injectives, claim for the introduction of an Ext functor that can be used without those constraints. The only problem is that it is not clear if the rich properties of the homological Ext are also valid for the Yoneda Ext.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, following [3, Appendix B], let us briefly recall some relevant facts about the map of schemes ιp:SpecscriptOX,pX, where p is a point of X. This map arises as the composition of the natural maps SpecscriptOX,pSpecscriptOXfalse(Ufalse)UX,where UX is some open affine neighbourhood of p.…”
Section: Exactness Of the Internal Hommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [22, 0816], ιp is a quasicompact quasiseparated map, hence the direct image functor ιp, preserves quasicoherence by [22, 01LC]. (Note that the assumption on X being locally Noetherian in [3] is superfluous.) To ease the notation, let us further compose this functor with the standard equivalence of categories scriptOX,p-ModQCohfalse(prefixSpecOX,pfalse),obtaining the functor trueιp,:scriptOX,p-ModQCohfalse(Xfalse).This functor can also be viewed as the right adjoint to the functor of taking stalks at p, ()p:QCohfalse(Xfalse)scriptOX,p-Mod.…”
Section: Exactness Of the Internal Hommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation