Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Posterior Capsule Opacification After Cataract Surgery with Five Different Intraocular Lenses: An Economic Analysis for Spain

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the economic impact of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy and its related complications for five different intraocular lenses (IOLs) from the payer and hospital perspectives in Spain. Materials and Methods The three-year incidence rates of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy after cataract surgery with five different single-piece acrylic monofocal IOLs (AcrySof IOLs, AJL LLASY60, IOL Tech Stabibag, Medicontur Bi-flex, Zeiss Asphina) for 8293 patients were derived from odds ratios of multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, and diabetic retinopathy. A cost-consequence model for a hypothetical cohort of 2000 eyes was then developed to quantify the potential impact of Nd:YAG capsulotomy in terms of costs and time for each of the included IOLs, from the payer and hospital perspectives. Results The adjusted three-year Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy incidence was 5.0% (95% CI 3.9 to 6.1) for AcrySof and ranged from 26.0% to 44.0% for the other four IOLs. The average costs of Nd:YAG treatment and related complications were €261.90 for payers and €19.99 for hospitals. The average time needed for Nd:YAG treatment and related complications was 32.82 minutes. Model estimates based on 2000 hypothetical cataract surgeries showed that AcrySof IOLs could lead to cost savings between €110,259.90 and €205,591.50 for payers. For hospitals, time, and cost savings with AcrySof ranged from 230.29 hours and €8415.79 compared to Zeiss Asphina to 429.40 hours and €15,692.15 compared to AJL LLASY60 IOLs. Conclusion Post cataract surgery, AcrySof IOLs were associated with a significantly lower incidence of Nd:YAG treatment and its subsequent complications compared to other IOLs. Our analysis shows that IOL choice is an important factor that can reduce the burden for patients, payers, and hospitals.

Influence of the CleaRing intraocular open capsule device on refractive predictability in cataract surgery

“…However, this remains the most frequent complication of routine cataract surgery, with laser capsulotomy rates ranging from 2% to 44%. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is the most common and efficient approach to manage PCO. Nevertheless, the procedure itself is not devoid of complications, including damage to the IOL, such as IOL pitting or dislocation, cystoid macular oedema, and retinal detachment.…”

“…As a result of the marked improvement in cataract surgery regarding surgical instrumentation and techniques and IOL quality, there has been a decline in posterior capsular opacification (PCO) incidence. However, this remains the most frequent complication of routine cataract surgery, with laser capsulotomy rates ranging from 2% to 44% 3–10 . Neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is the most common and efficient approach to manage PCO.…”