2004
DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.5.1642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin vs Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Bridging in Patients Receiving Long-term Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Spyropoulos et al performed a retrospective analysis of costs and clinical outcomes associated with LMWH for perioperative bridging in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (966). The mean total healthcare costs in the perioperative period were significantly lower (by $13 114) in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with LMWH than in those receiving it with UFH for an elective surgical procedure.…”
Section: Excessive Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spyropoulos et al performed a retrospective analysis of costs and clinical outcomes associated with LMWH for perioperative bridging in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (966). The mean total healthcare costs in the perioperative period were significantly lower (by $13 114) in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with LMWH than in those receiving it with UFH for an elective surgical procedure.…”
Section: Excessive Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…966 The mean total healthcare costs in the perioperative period were significantly lower (by $13 114) in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with LMWH than in those receiving it with UFH for an elective surgical procedure. The cost savings associated with LMWH use were accomplished through the avoidance or minimization of inpatient stays and no increase in the overall rate of clinical adverse events in the postoperative period.…”
Section: Excessive Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The cost savings associated with LMWH use were accomplished through the avoidance or minimization of inpatient stays and no increase in the overall rate of clinical adverse events in the postoperative period. 966 For patients with a bileaflet mechanical aortic valve and no risk factors, warfarin should be stopped before the procedure so that the INR is less than 1.5 (which is often 48 to 72 h after warfarin is discontinued) 934,967 and restarted within 24 h after a procedure. Admission to the hospital or a delay in discharge to give heparin is usually unnecessary.…”
Section: Excessive Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 In fact, although pharmacy costs are higher with LMWH, total healthcare costs are significantly lower in the LMWH-bridged group through avoidance or minimization of hospital stays and no overall increase of adverse events. 11 Bridging therapy is more readily accepted in high-thromboembolic-risk patients, 7,12 whereas methods for managing low-and intermediate-risk patients range from a minimalist strategy involving suspension of oral anticoagulant without administration of heparin 13 to an aggressive bridging with therapeutic doses of LMWH. 2,14 Clinical Perspective on p 2927…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%