2014
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costing natural hazards

Abstract: The proposed ‘cost assessment cycle’ is a framework for the integrated cost assessment of natural hazard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Europe is expected to face major impacts from a changing climate over the coming decades (Kreibich et al 2014). The hazard to society and environment will be largely connected to changes in extreme climate events due to their disproportionate rise compared to the corresponding change in climatological averages (Rummukainen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Europe is expected to face major impacts from a changing climate over the coming decades (Kreibich et al 2014). The hazard to society and environment will be largely connected to changes in extreme climate events due to their disproportionate rise compared to the corresponding change in climatological averages (Rummukainen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increasing exposure and vulnerability of cities also play a role [4,5]. Thus, for pluvial flooding, an efficient, integrated risk management following the risk management cycle is also necessary [6,7]. However, pluvial floods often occur at much smaller spatial and temporal scales than fluvial floods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we provide a better understanding of total costs and their physical and social drivers, which is needed for appropriate risk management (Kreibich et al 2014). Our results suggest that improvement of current early warning system significantly reduces all categories (direct-indirect-tangible-intangible) of damages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%