2005
DOI: 10.1002/art.20903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost‐utility and cost‐effectiveness analyses of a long‐term, high‐intensity exercise program compared with conventional physical therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: Objective. To estimate the cost utility and cost effectiveness of long-term, high-intensity exercise classes compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods. RA patients (n ‫؍‬ 300) were randomly assigned to either exercise classes or UC; followup lasted for 2 years. $1.05). The increase per patient in total medical costs of physical therapy was estimated at €430 (95% CI €318, 577), and the increase in total societal costs at €602 (95% CI €؊490, 1,664). For societal willingness-to-pay … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the Cost-Effectiveness Panel in Health and Medicine has been standing up for the use of values obtained from the community and not from patients, when conducting economic analyses 32 . The Brazier method has been more commonly used in recent studies, especially the most up-to-date version, from 2002, which may, in the future, contribute to improve the assessment of the SF-6D validity [33][34][35][36][37] . It is also interesting to highlight that both the methods that use the SF-36 questionnaire and those that use the SF-6D questionnaire present strong correlations with one another 14-18, 21, 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the Cost-Effectiveness Panel in Health and Medicine has been standing up for the use of values obtained from the community and not from patients, when conducting economic analyses 32 . The Brazier method has been more commonly used in recent studies, especially the most up-to-date version, from 2002, which may, in the future, contribute to improve the assessment of the SF-6D validity [33][34][35][36][37] . It is also interesting to highlight that both the methods that use the SF-36 questionnaire and those that use the SF-6D questionnaire present strong correlations with one another 14-18, 21, 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthritis Patients In Training cohort (37), which are more expensive than home-based interventions (3), provided insufficient improvement to justify the additional costs as a medicoeconomic issue. An exercise program could be of particular interest to the elderly by reducing the risk of falls and fractures (38 -40) and by improving the cardiovascular disease risk profile (41).…”
Section: Baillet Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EQ-5D utility is a useful tool for calculating the number of quality adjusted life years gained and for making decisions for health managers and economists by comparing the cost utility of different treatments in several diseases (48). The current training program obtained relevant improvements in all 5 HRQOL dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%