2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States (US)

Abstract: The massive electric power blackout in the northeastern U.S. and Canada on August [14][15] 2003 catalyzed discussions about modernizing the U.S. electricity grid. Industry sources suggested that investments of $50 to $100 billion would be needed. This work seeks to better understand an important piece of information that has been missing from these discussions: what do power interruptions and fluctuations in power quality (power-quality events) cost electricity consumers?We developed a bottom-up approach fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is that different users are affected differently by the same power interruption. A subdivision also makes sense since no marketable output results from power consumption in private households (Ratha et al, 2013), which makes it more difficult to quantify the costs of the interruption (LaCommare and Eto, 2006). In the following sections, the techniques will be briefly presented and their advantages and disadvantages will be discussed (see Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Voll Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that different users are affected differently by the same power interruption. A subdivision also makes sense since no marketable output results from power consumption in private households (Ratha et al, 2013), which makes it more difficult to quantify the costs of the interruption (LaCommare and Eto, 2006). In the following sections, the techniques will be briefly presented and their advantages and disadvantages will be discussed (see Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Voll Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of estimates from other countries is often inadequate. The second-case study-approach uses cost estimates from historical blackouts (see Lacommare and Eto [13] [17]). While the case study approach avoids the bias of the consumer survey method, its major shortcoming has been the difficulty to generalize the results because history will not always repeat itself (Linares and Rey [20]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the availability of detailed data in these countries, most of the studies have estimated the power outage cost at the country level as well as the sector and region levels. In a case study approach focusing on the power interruptions that occurred in the US on 14-15 August 2003, Lacommare and Eto [13] estimated the cost to electricity consumers, indicating that the annual cost for power interruptions to US electricity consumers was around 79 billion USD. In Germany, Praktiknjo, Hahnel, and Erdmann [14] proposed a survey-based model to analyze the costs of power interruptions; Praktiknjo [15] used online survey data within a two-staged bottom-up regression model and implied that power interruptions are in average relatively expensive for residential consumers.…”
Section: Related Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translating benefits into money is essential for an investment decision and must be based on the aggregate beneficial change brought about by the smart grid project [47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Therefore, to evaluate and compare past, present and future values, a baseline (or reference) scenario is necessary.…”
Section: Guidelines For the Assessment Of A Smart Grid Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%