2011
DOI: 10.1177/1352458511424422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost of multiple sclerosis in the Czech Republic: The COMS study

Abstract: The total costs of MS in the Czech Republic are estimated at €208.6 million per year. Consistent with other studies, the costs increase significantly with the severity of MS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, cognitive impairment has recently been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of employment status and associated societal costs,5, 6 negatively impacting social functioning, coping, quality of life, and treatment adherence among patients with MS 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, cognitive impairment has recently been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of employment status and associated societal costs,5, 6 negatively impacting social functioning, coping, quality of life, and treatment adherence among patients with MS 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of variation, defined as standard deviation compared to the mean, was 0.15 and 0.38, for EDSS II and III, respectively, for all 12 studies including EDSS estimates of costs. Concerning the mildest severity categorization, hereafter called EDSS I, seven out of ten studies that specified costs per category identified MS treatment as the main cost driver [26,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. The cost driver varied more between studies in the moderate severity group, EDSS II, where it was identified as drugs or MS treatment [37,[39][40][41], permanent reductions in productive work [26,38,43], other classifications of indirect costs [57,58], and informal care [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost driver varied more between studies in the moderate severity group, EDSS II, where it was identified as drugs or MS treatment [37,[39][40][41], permanent reductions in productive work [26,38,43], other classifications of indirect costs [57,58], and informal care [42]. Four out of ten studies [38,[40][41][42] identified informal care as the main cost driver for individuals in the most severe group, EDSS III, whereas four studies identified production losses due to permanent reductions in productive work [26,37,39,43] and two identified other types of indirect costs [57,58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations