2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Furthermore, the results were in line with the conclusions drawn from 2 recent literature reviews [30][31][32] Methods…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Furthermore, the results were in line with the conclusions drawn from 2 recent literature reviews [30][31][32] Methods…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Nevertheless, it is expected that these uncertainties surrounding the cost inputs were of minor impact on the results as demonstrated by the deterministic sensitivity analysis. Overall, our model which incorporated for the first time the real-life time efficacy waning with age, produced robust results aligned with existing literature 22,30,31 on HZ vaccination costeffectiveness and is highly transferable to the German setting. This study bring useful evidence to document what could be the potential expected efficiency of new vaccination program, benefits difficult to estimate prior vaccination implementation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…6,14 Cost effectiveness of Zostavax varies depending on patients' age and is more cost effective for patients aged 60–70 years but is not as cost effective for patients aged >80 years. 15,16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of 15 studies from North America and Europe, most concluded the zoster vaccine was cost effective, assuming that protection lasted an average of 10 years following immunization; the main cost benefits were via reducing morbidity associated with PHN, rather than zoster [97]. …”
Section: Development Of a Vaccine Against Zoster Efficacy And Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original SPS had a relatively short follow up period (mean 3.4 years) so the duration of vaccine-induced protection was unclear. Most cost-effectiveness studies assumed life-long vaccine protection, some studies modeled a more conservative 7.5–10 years protection and others incorporated a waning effect of the vaccine over time [97]. Longer-term follow up of SPS participants, in the Short and Long Term Persistence Study (STPS and LTPS, respectively), demonstrates a waning of VE over time.…”
Section: Development Of a Vaccine Against Zoster Efficacy And Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%