2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for red-listed wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter was also found by Perhans et al [17]. Jonsson et al [24] simulated different silvicultural treatments in southern, middle and northern Sweden, and the opportunity cost of setting aside stands as reserves in middle Sweden was SEK43.424 ha −1 , which is of the same magnitude as the opportunity cost given by Wikberg et al [15] and the results presented here ( Table 4). As the micro topography cost model is independent of the shortest path model, the scenario-based method can easily be adjusted for other wheel-and ground-based extraction systems, e.g., skidders, farm tractors or horses.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Some Limitationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter was also found by Perhans et al [17]. Jonsson et al [24] simulated different silvicultural treatments in southern, middle and northern Sweden, and the opportunity cost of setting aside stands as reserves in middle Sweden was SEK43.424 ha −1 , which is of the same magnitude as the opportunity cost given by Wikberg et al [15] and the results presented here ( Table 4). As the micro topography cost model is independent of the shortest path model, the scenario-based method can easily be adjusted for other wheel-and ground-based extraction systems, e.g., skidders, farm tractors or horses.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Some Limitationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Both the prescriptions and the harvesting cost calculations were on the stand level and, thus, not adapted to retention patches. Jonsson et al [24] did a cost-benefit simulation of how six types of coarse woody debris (CWD) varied with seven management options. One of the management options was retention of small parts of the area, but their focus was the environmental values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for live trees it is most cost-efficient to save birch and aspen in southern Sweden, and pine and spruce in the north (Jonsson et al, 2010). To create dead wood, it is most efficient to set aside forest in northern Sweden, while in southern Sweden it is better to increase the amounts in managed forests (Jonsson et al, 2006). In general, for the creation of dead wood it is more cost-efficient to save naturally dying trees and to create high stumps than to retain living trees, to scarify the soil manually after logging to avoid harm to logs, and to prolong the rotation period .…”
Section: Cost-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the experimental application of landscape retention forestry would allow the establishment of operative thresholds that could be used to reach specific conservation goals, according to disturbance regimes and site heterogeneity and composition (Rosenvald & Lõhmus 2008). Combining different measures optimized according to site features and costeffectiveness of interventions, can increase the feasibility of conservation strategies (Jonsson et al 2006). Conservation planning software like MARXAN (Watts et al 2009) offers further instruments to effectively allocate conservation efforts.…”
Section: Landscape Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%