2016
DOI: 10.1101/065540
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: are we there yet?

Abstract: Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has the potential to personalize pharmaceutical treatments. Many relevant gene-drug associations have been discovered, but PGx guided treatment needs to be cost-effective as well as clinically beneficial to be incorporated into standard healthcare.Progress in this area can be assessed by reviewing economic evaluations to determine the cost-effectiveness of PGx testing versus standard treatment. We performed a review of economic evaluations for PGx associations listed in the US Food and D… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This and the other steps needed for routine clinical application of pharmacogenetic testing require robust cost-effectiveness evidence before implementation. A medical intervention is defined as cost-effective when it costs more than standard care, but the extra-cost is considered acceptable based on the improvements in clinical outcomes, according to what is usually defined as willingness to pay threshold [25]. There are a few published studies looking at the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing in guiding antidepressant prescription compared to standard care [26][27][28].…”
Section: Barriers To the Clinical Implementation Of Pharmacogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This and the other steps needed for routine clinical application of pharmacogenetic testing require robust cost-effectiveness evidence before implementation. A medical intervention is defined as cost-effective when it costs more than standard care, but the extra-cost is considered acceptable based on the improvements in clinical outcomes, according to what is usually defined as willingness to pay threshold [25]. There are a few published studies looking at the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing in guiding antidepressant prescription compared to standard care [26][27][28].…”
Section: Barriers To the Clinical Implementation Of Pharmacogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, testing costs significantly influence the value of personalized treatments and may not always be cost-effective. 92 The limited data from pragmatic studies with long-term outcomes further complicates value analysis. 93 Ongoing trials, adoption of electronic health records (EHR), and the ability to generate "big data" may address some barriers.…”
Section: Health Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the ongoing benefits of pharmacogenetic testing may decrease the cost of hospitalization and healthcare treatment due to ineffective therapies or severe side effects that could have been avoided with genetic testing and tailored medical treatment [102,111]. In fact, most pharmacoeconomic studies support the pharmacogenetic testing is a cost-effective or cost-saving strategy [112,113].…”
Section: Implementation Of Pharmacogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%