2021
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1973415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes screening including prevention of type 2 diabetes: application of the GeDiForCE model in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is unclear as although the Medicare Benefits schedule cost of the OGTT is $19.90 AUD, this is unlikely to reflect the true cost of the test in terms of personnel time involved three blood draws and facilities for patient to wait for 2 h [ 29 ]. Regardless, if CGM was shown to be better reflective of women’s glycaemic status than OGTT (i.e., fewer false positives and negatives), it would become cost-saving, given the recent findings of Beilby of costs of almost $6,000 AUD per ante/postnatal care in case of GDM diagnosis (false positive) and over $5,500 per perinatal adverse events in case of not intervention (false negative) [ 30 ]. When considering the OGTT/CGM prices and the economic consequences of potential GDM misdiagnosis, the increased cost of CGM appears justified by the potential prospective saving in antenatal and postnatal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is unclear as although the Medicare Benefits schedule cost of the OGTT is $19.90 AUD, this is unlikely to reflect the true cost of the test in terms of personnel time involved three blood draws and facilities for patient to wait for 2 h [ 29 ]. Regardless, if CGM was shown to be better reflective of women’s glycaemic status than OGTT (i.e., fewer false positives and negatives), it would become cost-saving, given the recent findings of Beilby of costs of almost $6,000 AUD per ante/postnatal care in case of GDM diagnosis (false positive) and over $5,500 per perinatal adverse events in case of not intervention (false negative) [ 30 ]. When considering the OGTT/CGM prices and the economic consequences of potential GDM misdiagnosis, the increased cost of CGM appears justified by the potential prospective saving in antenatal and postnatal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these cases subside after delivery, but unfortunately, some of these women will suffer from T2D or other forms of glucose intolerance after successive deliveries [ 31 ]. Solid statistics document that 70% of women with gestational diabetes are at a high risk of developing diabetes (mainly T2D) later in their lives [ 33 , 34 ]. Therefore, antenatal care should not be neglected among pregnant women, especially in societies of the developing world where physical activity is almost non-existent among women in such populations.…”
Section: Metabolic Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%