2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a state funded programme for control of severe asthma

Abstract: Background: Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and a major economical burden to families and health systems. Whereas efficacy of current therapeutical options has been clearly established, cost-effectiveness analysis of public health interventions for asthma control are scarce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
62
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After being enrolled in the programme -an annual surplus of US$ 1500 per family became available (33,34). This result confirms that action based on providing access to medication, education and health care works among the low-income populations as well.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…After being enrolled in the programme -an annual surplus of US$ 1500 per family became available (33,34). This result confirms that action based on providing access to medication, education and health care works among the low-income populations as well.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…It is worth noting that it is hard to distinguish poverty from other environmental variables or lifestyles that go with it and may be involved in asthma, such as pollution, smoking, respiratory infections, low weight, and prematurity [11][12][13] . An ecological analysis including 20 Brazilian centers presented a direct association between asthma prevalence and inappropriate sanitation conditions, child mortality, inequity index (GINI), and mortality of all causes 14 . Some studies, not only in Brazil but also in other Latin American countries, Europe, Asia, and Africa, found higher asthma (self-reported or symptoms) prevalence in the urban area when compared with the rural area [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manuscript provides evidence that severe asthma leads to catastrophic expenditures to poor families, which were still not enough to give assess to proper treatment control the disease. Moreover, it demonstrates the major benefits achievable by treatment based on current guidelines, even in lowresource settings, in a strategy previously shown to be cost-effective and resulting in incremental savings as compared with managing exacerbations in emergency rooms and hospitals (15).…”
Section: The Unbearable Cost Of Severe Asthma In Underprivileged Popumentioning
confidence: 99%